Fucking hell! International breaks not only fuck up the season cause fucking injuries they also cause so much boredom to derail a totally hypothetical thread with pages about nonces owls z list journalists and fuck knows what else.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
City Mike 1969
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2021
- Messages
- 637
- Location
- Manchester
- Team supported
- The one that doesn't just lie about coming from Manchester.
it could be said that the person you were replying to didn’t phrase their comment clearly enough- however, the vast majority of people with a reasonable comprehension of the English language would understand what was inferred.I didn’t know UK has laws to hang, behead, draw and quarter people. That says who is the ignorant one here.
Makes you look a bit ignorant tbh.
roy.or.r
Well-Known Member
Please enlighten me then oh wise one!it could be said that the person you were replying to didn’t phrase their comment clearly enough- however, the vast majority of people with a reasonable comprehension of the English language would understand what was inferred.
Makes you look a bit ignorant tbh.
I know it's bollocks but find it hard to resist replying to every stupid comment.
These daily pop ups on FB and X claiming exclusives about the charges and our punishment.
Obviously just stories planted for the clicks and comments but the lack of understanding from the average person commenting is a concern. They clearly have no understanding of what is alleged and the fact we have not been found guilty of anything.
As an example I saw a story today of a Chippy owner in London who has been told to remove a mural on the side of his Chippy by the Council.
The mural was a classic large fish stood up waving a Union Jack with a slogan about British best or whatever.
It was all very innocent and looked OK but the headline was "Council order to remove the mural etc"
I knew exactly what was coming in the comments and was not disappointed.
"It's our Country" " typical Council" etc etc etc.
I thought I'd read the article for clarity.
The Council had ordered the man to remove the mural because
1. He did not have planning permission
2. The Wall and Chippy is in an area classed as a conservation area.
It was nothing to do with the Union Jack and Britain but they ran the story knowing full well idiots would comment without reading or understanding the facts.
This is the same with our case and the sooner it is put to bed the better.
These daily pop ups on FB and X claiming exclusives about the charges and our punishment.
Obviously just stories planted for the clicks and comments but the lack of understanding from the average person commenting is a concern. They clearly have no understanding of what is alleged and the fact we have not been found guilty of anything.
As an example I saw a story today of a Chippy owner in London who has been told to remove a mural on the side of his Chippy by the Council.
The mural was a classic large fish stood up waving a Union Jack with a slogan about British best or whatever.
It was all very innocent and looked OK but the headline was "Council order to remove the mural etc"
I knew exactly what was coming in the comments and was not disappointed.
"It's our Country" " typical Council" etc etc etc.
I thought I'd read the article for clarity.
The Council had ordered the man to remove the mural because
1. He did not have planning permission
2. The Wall and Chippy is in an area classed as a conservation area.
It was nothing to do with the Union Jack and Britain but they ran the story knowing full well idiots would comment without reading or understanding the facts.
This is the same with our case and the sooner it is put to bed the better.
and a bag of inhalersHow dare you. That champions league belongs to LIVERPOOL even if Madrid knocked them out. All of our trophies, since the takeover, are theirs, because they are ethical and Kloop did it with a shoe string budget.
And organically.How dare you. That champions league belongs to LIVERPOOL even if Madrid knocked them out. All of our trophies, since the takeover, are theirs, because they are ethical and Kloop did it with a shoe string budget.
eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
They know it’s a touchy subject for the majority of the country who don’t want the flag our grandparents fought and died for defeating the Nazis eradicated in the name of so called inclusivityI know it's bollocks but find it hard to resist replying to every stupid comment.
These daily pop ups on FB and X claiming exclusives about the charges and our punishment.
Obviously just stories planted for the clicks and comments but the lack of understanding from the average person commenting is a concern. They clearly have no understanding of what is alleged and the fact we have not been found guilty of anything.
As an example I saw a story today of a Chippy owner in London who has been told to remove a mural on the side of his Chippy by the Council.
The mural was a classic large fish stood up waving a Union Jack with a slogan about British best or whatever.
It was all very innocent and looked OK but the headline was "Council order to remove the mural etc"
I knew exactly what was coming in the comments and was not disappointed.
"It's our Country" " typical Council" etc etc etc.
I thought I'd read the article for clarity.
The Council had ordered the man to remove the mural because
1. He did not have planning permission
2. The Wall and Chippy is in an area classed as a conservation area.
It was nothing to do with the Union Jack and Britain but they ran the story knowing full well idiots would comment without reading or understanding the facts.
This is the same with our case and the sooner it is put to bed the better.
lancs blue
Well-Known Member
Where did I say that? I don't know what it's really like in the UAE and I'd bet nor do 61% of the UK population.So you are saying 61% people have no idea what’s going on in UAE but you somehow do?
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,650
I know it's bollocks but find it hard to resist replying to every stupid comment.
These daily pop ups on FB and X claiming exclusives about the charges and our punishment.
Obviously just stories planted for the clicks and comments but the lack of understanding from the average person commenting is a concern. They clearly have no understanding of what is alleged and the fact we have not been found guilty of anything.
As an example I saw a story today of a Chippy owner in London who has been told to remove a mural on the side of his Chippy by the Council.
The mural was a classic large fish stood up waving a Union Jack with a slogan about British best or whatever.
It was all very innocent and looked OK but the headline was "Council order to remove the mural etc"
I knew exactly what was coming in the comments and was not disappointed.
"It's our Country" " typical Council" etc etc etc.
I thought I'd read the article for clarity.
The Council had ordered the man to remove the mural because
1. He did not have planning permission
2. The Wall and Chippy is in an area classed as a conservation area.
It was nothing to do with the Union Jack and Britain but they ran the story knowing full well idiots would comment without reading or understanding the facts.
This is the same with our case and the sooner it is put to bed the better.
Flags & City are the best bait for the Twitter waterways.
JGL07
Well-Known Member
The problem is that certain ‘home grown’ neo-nazis appear to be trying to ‘appropriate’ this flag to their own ends. It is not that simple.They know it’s a touchy subject for the majority of the country who don’t want the flag our grandparents fought and died for defeating the Nazis eradicated in the name of so called inclusivity