PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

In order to understand this problem you have to imagine that you are one of the cartel. Think how their minds work as hard nosed businessmen who are in football primarily for the money and future value of their assets.

They are only concerned about the future. Which I keep on banging on about. Their main rivals must be controlled and stopped from progressing, while they need to work with their allies to maintain supremacy. All that is happening makes perfect sense under this lense.

Liverpool no Champions League this season- big financial hit.

Man City this season potential Champions League income 129 million if win. Even if we knocked out suspect 50 million earnings higher than United.

Next season potentially no Champions League for United. Stefan says Champions League prize fund increase with more games. Therfore estimate 150 million potential earnings for City win. That is potential maybe 100 million extra earnings than United, even if they have Europa League success.

Club World Cup 2025 could be reported in next seasons financial results I suspect. City
reporting to end of June, suspect could change to end of July to include these earnings. Projected 50 to 100 million for win.

As I have said, they have to get us now or they are loosing the race big time.
 
100%. And when you try to circumnavigate this & drag BM into the modern world, some FOC who prefererred the world when it was viewed on a Black & white telly, is sure to kick up a stink, because they don't get the reason for emojis.
What’s the reason for preventing the use of emojis? Is it something to do with the structure of the site?
 
Here's my prediction of what happens:
1) The IR comes in and announces it is reviewing all outstanding disciplinary cases in effect shutting down the IC
2) Two years later the IR announces that all outstanding disciplinary cases from the pre IR era have been reviewed and no further action will be taken due to the historic nature of such cases (it'll be 10 years since the original EPL charge)
3) we get off due to time barring, bribery and human rights
4) we beat united home and away
5) Pep extends again
6) we celebrate by signing an actual left back and play him at right wing then send him on loan to Troyes
7) Khaldoon expresses the desire to put the disciplinary issues behind us and the club will speak no further on the matter
8) Sergio Agueros son will join our academy
9) Manchester City council will announce the end to on street parking within 10 miles of the Etihad and tram services will be limited. A single water taxi will go from town to the co-op arena once a month
10) Rashford will sign for Sunderland
 
What’s the reason for preventing the use of emojis? Is it something to do with the structure of the site?
Nope. The last time it was brought up, emojis were viewed as taking away from BM's sterile look, with some FOC saying they looked childish.

As pointed out by @fulabeer if someone regales a sad event like the Blue who went missing & was recently found deceased at Chorlton/Sale Waterpark, it's more fitting to show a sad emoji, than a thumbs up like.

Now I come to think of it, arguments raged for years before a like function was eventually added. I think the reasoning was people liking a post would reduce member interactions. It doesn't look like that ended up being the case after all.

Some FOC's just need to be kept away from anything that requires electricity as an energy source, as they evidently yearn for a time when parafin lights were all the rage.
 
Didnt ferguson start spouting along with wenga about banning youth matches against mcfc because offering free education at st bede's was cheating ( from memory i think we'd just bounced them and sunderland goals galore)
I mean the man is vile. Offering free St Bede education to players as a fallback is a wonderful thing and the FA should make such moves mandatory.
 
And they’ll have found a way to avoid paying, blamed the waiter, then instructed the restaurant to deduct it from his wages.
Can see the Glazers buying the restaurant with someone else’s money, diverting all the revenue to a bank account in the Cayman Islands, appoint (and sack) several substandard managers, employ a load of overpaid and lazy staff, run it into the ground for twenty years and then sell it to a scruffy **** from Failsworth.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.