PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

100%. And when you try to circumnavigate this & drag BM into the modern world, some FOC who prefererred the world when it was viewed on a Black & white telly, is sure to kick up a stink, because they don't get the reason for emojis.
At the very least we could have a thumbs down option, which I think might kill some of these tangential debates that have nothing to do with the thread's main subject.
 
At the very least we could have a thumbs down option, which I think might kill some of these tangential debates that have nothing to do with the thread's main subject.
Very true. Now you mention it, I can't recall seeing online arguments erupt because someone gave a thumbs down.

Adding emojis is as simple as allowing certain types of unicodes. Evidently it's a choice not to allow them, rather than it being a technical limitation of the website or app.
 
At the very least we could have a thumbs down option, which I think might kill some of these tangential debates that have nothing to do with the thread's main subject.
Iirc there wasn’t that option offered back in the day when the addition of the ‘like’ button (and whether to have a few more - anger, love etc) was discussed… (and possibly voted on, can’t remember).
I’d be happy with a dislike reaction, but no more.

With regard to emoji’s I don’t know why they are disabled from appearing, presumably to stop abuse of the ability to clutter up the textual clean forum (have you seen rawk?!).

I was also against avatar’s and the like , and still am. The screen real estate on a phone is limited enough (with ads) for the forum, and having avatars/animated avatars is just distracting and takes space.

Anyway, maybe start a thread in the technical area?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.