PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[manimanc]

Apart from “United are back”

Or "utd are in transition" (still! 11 years later) which I heard someone trot out this week.

 

[hello]

Does anyone have an answer that kills the "no smoke without fire" argument? I mean aside from the obvious!

View attachment 113414

Doubt he would have the intelligence to comprehend however a simple chemical reaction between ammonia (NH3) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) to form the salt ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) creates smoke without fire.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Crying over spilt milk gives it a run for its money…..

tbf, there is no point crying over spilt milk - there can be smoke without fire!

 

[Kinkybyname]

hydrogen

tbf, there is no point crying over spilt milk - there can be smoke without fire!

and generates more heat than light

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

They are damaging the sporting integrity of the league by making points deductions. They will then compound their mistakes if they change the rules that could have potentially have led to clubs being relegated.

Exactly. To deduct points you have to be certain that those points were a direct consequence of the excess spending. You can never do that with any degree of accuracy. Chelsea and united have shown that spending huge amounts of money is not necessarily effective.

The sensible approach is probably to restrict spending in future years. So if Everton overspend by £25m in a 3-year period, restrict them to spending £25m less in the following season. That would involve a cap on transfer fees and wages, similar to what La Liga does.

 

[hello]

tbf, there is no point crying over spilt milk - there can be smoke without fire!

However if the milk is spilt on fabric it'll probably drive some to tears when it starts to stink.

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Exactly. To deduct points you have to be certain that those points were a direct consequence of the excess spending. You can never do that with any degree of accuracy. Chelsea and united have shown that spending huge amounts of money is not necessarily effective.

The sensible approach is probably to restrict spending in future years. So if Everton overspend by £25m in a 3-year period, restrict them to spending £25m less in the following season. That would involve a cap on transfer fees and wages, similar to what La Liga does.

Based on their efforts so far, it is very obvious that the PL aren't interested in applying any sensible solutions to their self made fuck up.

 

[dadnlad]

Exactly. To deduct points you have to be certain that those points were a direct consequence of the excess spending. You can never do that with any degree of accuracy. Chelsea and united have shown that spending huge amounts of money is not necessarily effective.

The sensible approach is probably to restrict spending in future years. So if Everton overspend by £25m in a 3-year period, restrict them to spending £25m less in the following season. That would involve a cap on transfer fees and wages, similar to what La Liga does.

this would also encourage academy players being used

 

[dadnlad]

Based on their efforts so far, it is very obvious that the PL aren't interested in applying any sensible solutions to their self made fuck up.

well their rules allow the cartel cherry pick players at cheaper value

 

[Spanishbob]

No smoke without fire ffs. It’s the most idiotic expression in the English language.

Just had this conversation with my Newcastle stroke dipper fan. No smoke without fire shit. Just said we are going around in circles has per usual you plastic ****. Fuck off back to Yorkshire and support you old club Bradford City. Jesus