gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
tbf, there is no point crying over spilt milk - there can be smoke without fire!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Kinkybyname
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 2,993
- Team supported
- Manchester City
hydrogen
and generates more heat than lighttbf, there is no point crying over spilt milk - there can be smoke without fire!
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
Exactly. To deduct points you have to be certain that those points were a direct consequence of the excess spending. You can never do that with any degree of accuracy. Chelsea and united have shown that spending huge amounts of money is not necessarily effective.They are damaging the sporting integrity of the league by making points deductions. They will then compound their mistakes if they change the rules that could have potentially have led to clubs being relegated.
The sensible approach is probably to restrict spending in future years. So if Everton overspend by £25m in a 3-year period, restrict them to spending £25m less in the following season. That would involve a cap on transfer fees and wages, similar to what La Liga does.
However if the milk is spilt on fabric it'll probably drive some to tears when it starts to stink.tbf, there is no point crying over spilt milk - there can be smoke without fire!
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,561
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Exactly. To deduct points you have to be certain that those points were a direct consequence of the excess spending. You can never do that with any degree of accuracy. Chelsea and united have shown that spending huge amounts of money is not necessarily effective.
The sensible approach is probably to restrict spending in future years. So if Everton overspend by £25m in a 3-year period, restrict them to spending £25m less in the following season. That would involve a cap on transfer fees and wages, similar to what La Liga does.
Based on their efforts so far, it is very obvious that the PL aren't interested in applying any sensible solutions to their self made fuck up.
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
this would also encourage academy players being usedExactly. To deduct points you have to be certain that those points were a direct consequence of the excess spending. You can never do that with any degree of accuracy. Chelsea and united have shown that spending huge amounts of money is not necessarily effective.
The sensible approach is probably to restrict spending in future years. So if Everton overspend by £25m in a 3-year period, restrict them to spending £25m less in the following season. That would involve a cap on transfer fees and wages, similar to what La Liga does.
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
well their rules allow the cartel cherry pick players at cheaper valueBased on their efforts so far, it is very obvious that the PL aren't interested in applying any sensible solutions to their self made fuck up.
Spanishbob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2020
- Messages
- 1,204
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Just had this conversation with my Newcastle stroke dipper fan. No smoke without fire shit. Just said we are going around in circles has per usual you plastic ****. Fuck off back to Yorkshire and support you old club Bradford City. JesusNo smoke without fire ffs. It’s the most idiotic expression in the English language.
inchy14
Well-Known Member
Cry over spilt beer but not milk…tbf, there is no point crying over spilt milk - there can be smoke without fire!
Start some vicious rumour about PWB involving goats and paganistic rituals and then say to them no smoke without fire. Hurray!Does anyone have an answer that kills the "no smoke without fire" argument? I mean aside from the obvious!
View attachment 113414