PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Does anyone have an answer that kills the "no smoke without fire" argument? I mean aside from the obvious!

View attachment 113414
So everyone who is found not guilty and everyone who has charges dropped is er .... guilty, if the "smoke" anology is to hold up. Either that, or it's a charcoal fire.
 
Last edited:
One thing i am struggling to understand is the the PL and City both went to court wanting the whole thing to be kept private, if i recall this correctly.

So if this was the case and expulsion was on the cards, are we really believing that we would have woke up one morning to find we had been expelled. it just seems too far fetched to me.
 
‘PWB is a nonce. There’s your smoke, some bloke said it on the internet - therefore clearly true. Get to jail’
I'm just PrestwichBlue (PB) not Prestwich& WhitefieldBlue (PWB).

This whole notion of "There's 115 charges so they must be guilty of something" is completely ridiculous. There are essentially 3 substantive issues that make up those 115, and the biggest of them was dismissed by CAS because UEFA couldn't supply the evidence to support them.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.