PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[paulchapo]

No, there's only about 20 maltesers in a bag nowadays

They've also shrunk, tiny now.

 

[Xhavenjoe]

They've also shrunk, tiny now.

Swimming in the sea at this time of the year can do that

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Is this a bit like being caught allegedly shoplifting one bag of Maltesers and being separately charged for each individual sweet contained in the bag?

It’s more like picking up a bag of Maltesers and before you get to the checkout being arrested and separately charged for each individual sweet contained in the bag.

 

[Rory Bluelow]

My utd supporting work colleague says it is :

1 - Like getting sponsorships worth billions and buying illegal players weith the profits
2 - Buying too many expenisve players
3 - Using sport to wash laundered money out of the country.
4 - Etihad, something to do with Etihad!
5 - Paying Haaland so much money he cant go to Real MAdrid.

40yrs old and comes out with that sort of shite.

40 years old but the brain of a small child !

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

40 years old and the penis of a small child !

 

[casebian]

40 years old but the brain of a small child !

Master blaster out of mad max comes to mind

 

[Milesvk]

It’s more like picking up a bag of Maltesers and before you get to the checkout being arrested and separately charged for each individual sweet contained in the bag.

More like being heard saying you might steel a bag of Maltesers. Then being arrested and separately charged for each individual sweet in the bag.

 

[Elbow beards]

It’s more like picking up a bag of Maltesers and before you get to the checkout being arrested and separately charged for each individual sweet contained in the bag.

More like being at the end of a human centipede when the one in front is being fed an arse load of maltesers.

 

[wolviedinho]

I don't think so. The PL statement listed 5 separate headings, multiplied by years and rules.

The rules are fairly generic so I can't see a scenario where the IC say we've breached rule E39 in 2015/16 but not rule E40. Or that we've breached E39 in 2015/16 but not in 2016/17.

The motivation could well have been to make it look much worse than it really is though.

That last part is spot on. I wouldn’t be surprised if they are using the Everton & Forest case to scare city into a compromise.

 

[halfcenturyup]

I’ve had dealings…

Is Dea-Lings the brother of J-Lingz?