PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I have never been entirely sanguine about the issue of co-operation either with UEFA or with PL. There are some things we would not want to disclose for confidentiality reasons and that might reasonably be argued but we seem to refuse some requests for no discernible reason.
If we have irrefutable evidence of our innocence, why withhold data?
I think you are exactly right about confidentiality and City will argue their points against non cooperation. Khaldoon is in this to the finish, no compromise, no back tracking, fight to the end. Enjoy the ride, it's going to be fun and whichever way it goes we will still be here, not, we're not really here, but really really here cheering on the champs.
 
Does it sound very vague to anyone else? It just feel like these 'new' allegations are more matter of opinion about the documents look like and what the the PL want them to say? There needs to be more meat on the bones of this and there isn't - which obviously suits their narrative, again !

Why comment on this non cooperation issue separately, now? Is it not the job of the 'independent' panel to decide whether City cooperated sufficiently?
 
I have never been entirely sanguine about the issue of co-operation either with UEFA or with PL. There are some things we would not want to disclose for confidentiality reasons and that might reasonably be argued but we seem to refuse some requests for no discernible reason.
If we have irrefutable evidence of our innocence, why withhold data?

I understood it up to the point of the CAS case to an extent as part of our defence was that we didn’t think some of the evidence should have been admissable. Only to an extent though and I haven’t got the logic since.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.