I allowed for confidential stuff; I should have said “other data.”
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
cleavers
Moderator
Dozens of pages today, I assume nothing has actually happened.
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
Liverpool and Arsenal lost.Dozens of pages today, I assume nothing has actually happened.
eversince 76
Well-Known Member
Just saw the Daily Fail provided yet another article about the 115 charges to ease the sorrow of tarquins and dippers.
Oh, and to fuel more motivation in the City squad. They still don’t get it …
Oh, and to fuel more motivation in the City squad. They still don’t get it …
cleavers
Moderator
Fair point.Liverpool and Arsenal lost.
55yr old teenager
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Apr 2017
- Messages
- 1,733
It's saying not found. What did it say?Where is this information from?
eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
Someone important has died, judging by the mood on Sky Sports NewsDozens of pages today, I assume nothing has actually happened.
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 16,055
- Team supported
- Manchester City
It's saying not found. What did it say?
It wasn't really about City.
@projectriver having a bit of fun, posted an extract of text concerning one of the clubs sanctioned by the PL and a lack of cooperation, and without naming the club, the inference was that it was about City.
abu13
Well-Known Member
It was interesting that when Everton released their statement following their 2 point deduction they made a point of stressing full Co-operation, at the time i thought it was a veiled dig at us but in hindsight it looks like it was a dig at the PL.Slsbn tweeted saying how we might be dealt with for noncooperation with an extract from the EPL judgement on ”the club” saying far ftom cooperating they were obstructive - in a nutshell. Many, me included, assumed the club was city but….
Slsbn later revealed the club was Everton, and that on appeal the IC rejected the PL assertion of lack of cooperatio/obstruction and stated that on the contrary Everton had fully cooperated.
He caught a few including me, but just shows (imo) why City were right to challenge the PL all the way
GaudinoMotors
Well-Known Member
A somewhat concerning twist - someone respected and trusted ....... being a bit of a needy look at me.Dozens of pages today, I assume nothing has actually happened.
Last edited: