PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

‘Resolve’ is unquestionably vernacular deployed by legal professionals when referring to the settlement of a case between the parties, rather than determination by a tribunal following a hearing - and whilst Masters presents as a bit of thick ****, even braindead punters can have a habit of parroting their legal representatives, if only to make themselves appear to be smarter than they are.

Putting his incoherence to the side for a minutes, is there any such mechamism on the PL process to mutually 'settle' a case once it is with the independend commission, at that stage of it.
 
As always happens - a positive rumour comes out and magically all sorts of new ITKs appear spouting similar.

The hearing has not even happened yet so the tweet from prestige cars is obviously complete bollocks.

As for taking legal action against all sorts of media haters, we’ve had several legal heads on here in the past saying that libel action is highly unlikely.

I want to believe this kind of stuff as much all blues - but all seems a bit wishful thinking to me.

When a poster with a legal background posts we have good grounds for legal action I will take more notice.
Great user name.
 
Not if they drop them all due to irrefutable evidence.
IIRC the CAS said that if we had passed the irrefutable evidence in the uefa case to uefa instead of passing it directly to CAS, because of leaks, and suffering a fine for non-cooperation, that on receipt of said evidence, uefa would have had no option but to drop their case.
 
I'm bloody so fed up of the whole thing. Even when otters ask me about it in a non accusing manner like at Brighton. City have done nothing wrong however have been the subject of a near 16 year campaign based on race hate. The Premier League has got to stop this nonsense.
 

Attachments

  • 588836E9-5508-4B19-9356-F1FC879A61F9.png
    588836E9-5508-4B19-9356-F1FC879A61F9.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 35
As always happens - a positive rumour comes out and magically all sorts of new ITKs appear spouting similar.

The hearing has not even happened yet so the tweet from prestige cars is obviously complete bollocks.

As for taking legal action against all sorts of media haters, we’ve had several legal heads on here in the past saying that libel action is highly unlikely.

I want to believe this kind of stuff as much all blues - but all seems a bit wishful thinking to me.

When a poster with a legal background posts we have good grounds for legal action I will take more notice.
 

Attachments

  • 125C643D-2849-4C2F-BDF4-DA15497F7B12.png
    125C643D-2849-4C2F-BDF4-DA15497F7B12.png
    1.6 MB · Views: 74
was going to say why have a hearing if there is nothing to hear
Which in turn points to the fact that the (may have) IC refuted the case presented to them for lacking in substantial evidence.
Obviously I've only barrack room, bullshittery, experience in these matters. Thus, the wording above.
 
Last edited:
I'm bloody so fed up of the whole thing. Even when otters ask me about it in a non accusing manner like at Brighton. City have done nothing wrong however have been the subject of a near 16 year campaign based on race hate. The Premier League has got to stop this nonsense.
 

Attachments

  • Otter Relax GIF - Otter Relax Confidence - Discover & Share GIFs.gif
    Otter Relax GIF - Otter Relax Confidence - Discover & Share GIFs.gif
    550.7 KB · Views: 102

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.