PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

ancoats said:
So did anybody lodged a complaint on why £75million allowances were allowed or did United explain how that figure was reached ? I think you said £45million on covid 19 and £30million on legal fees from the sale of shares

So did United have to show the figures they made before Covid 19 on match days and losses because of Covid 19
Also, Legal fees should not be included or passed because it was a sale between the Glazers and Ratcliffe and both were rich enough to pay their legal cost
Click to expand...
Having missed 80 pages.... £30 million? Is that just the club's legal fees? Not Ratcliffe's as well? So the Glazers bought the club with borrowed money that was then a debt charge on the club costing millions in interest each year, and spent £30 million (on what? trying not to sell shares to Ratcliffe?) - and it's The Blues that get the bad publicity?
 
slbsn said:
Obviously not
Click to expand...
Your original comment seemed to suggest the clubs put it forward and it would only be questioned in extreme circumstance. United and Chelsea figures for things seem unusual. So if they Premier League ask more questions than I am suggesting how did they get through ? Why have clubs not complained ? Seems either the premier league are either not asking the right questions full stop or are in favor of certain teams and I don’t want to go down the conspiracy route
 
dickie davies said:
Yeah
@slbsn and @Prestwich_Blue are debating which hill the Premier League is standing on
Click to expand...
maxresdefault.jpg
 
slbsn said:
Because hacked emails created a case to answer
Click to expand...

So United failed Uefa FFP and was fined, So will the Premier League Open up a case against United

Also, if I create a fake hacked email and state I have found United had broken the rules with the Carlos Tevez loan and 3rd party ownership and payments were made to the 3rd party, City had to buy out Carlos Tevez ownership from KIa because you are not allowed 3rd party ownership in the Premier League, West Ham was punished for that reason
so how did United get around that for 2 seasons,

​

 
slbsn said:
Obviously not
Click to expand...

So how did the Premier League let United have £40million in allowances for Covid 19
Did they really lose £40million in match revenue ?? that's over £2million a game, the maths just doesn't add up

Also, we all know about the fake attendance figures they put out compared to the official police figures
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.