PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

That is a great post. Your description of the way these sort of cases play out is spot-on. The biggest moment in these legal battles is the advanced disclosure of documents. That's when everyone's cards are on the table. It seems clear that Masters is an imbecile but his lawyers are smart people who will not want to be publically humiliated.
agree that is a great post
 
I raised the question in February about the IC reviewing initial submissions before the formal hearing and the possibility that the IC could deem the evidence weak meaning the case could close out earlier, but I think the response I got was the case would go the full distance. If the complainant is told by the IC that their evidence is weak or non existent early on there can only be one outcome. The case closes earlier or there is some sort of settlement with City holding most of the cards. Hopefully this is where things are now.
 
I raised the question in February about the IC reviewing initial submissions before the formal hearing and the possibility that the IC could deem the evidence weak meaning the case could close out earlier, but I think the response I got was the case would go the full distance. If the complainant is told by the IC that their evidence is weak or non existent early on there can only be one outcome. The case closes earlier or there is some sort of settlement with City holding most of the cards. Hopefully this is where things are now.
Not a chance of a settlement. IMO.
If the premier league has fucked up then it's for them to take the hit. I just don't see us softening the blow for them.
It's their baby and they should put it to bed.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.