I raised the question in February about the IC reviewing initial submissions before the formal hearing and the possibility that the IC could deem the evidence weak meaning the case could close out earlier, but I think the response I got was the case would go the full distance. If the complainant is told by the IC that their evidence is weak or non existent early on there can only be one outcome. The case closes earlier or there is some sort of settlement with City holding most of the cards. Hopefully this is where things are now.