PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[CC1]

It's possible that the IC have been reviewing the evidence presented to them and have gone back to the PL saying "Are you serious?"

Now that WOULD be special - really hope so

 

[Stoned Rose]

Show some fucking respect. Prestige Car Repairs are one of the best car repairers in Greater Manchester. Easily top 8.

Remembering with fondness your old “8th” posts mate.

 

[MarsLlama]

Not if they drop them all due to irrefutable evidence.

Surely that would have happened months ago, if we actually had the irrefutable evidence we claim.

If this turns out to be true I will be embarrassed as anyone and I will personally apologise to Prestige. But I'm not going to start writing my apology letter yet.

 

[waspish]

Surely that would have happened months ago, if we actually had the irrefutable evidence we claim.

If this turns out to be true I will be embarrassed as anyone and I will personally apologise to Prestige. But I'm not going to start writing my apology letter yet.

The irrefutable evidence is our accounts and they have to go through about 10 years of them

 

[MarsLlama]

The irrefutable evidence is our accounts and they have to go through about 10 years of them

Don't misunderstand me, I also think we will be cleared of the vast majority of the charges, I just think the idea that we have already sent documents that have put the whole thing to bed to be incredibly unlikely. We will prove our innocence at a trial.

 

[Stoned Rose]

The more you think about it, the more it feels like this, is coming down to the none co-operation issue. Because that's probably the only thing they can contest, if everything else is falling in, around them.

If we’ve provided irrefutable evidence how can we have not co-operated?

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

Surely that would have happened months ago, if we actually had the irrefutable evidence we claim.

If this turns out to be true I will be embarrassed as anyone and I will personally apologise to Prestige. But I'm not going to start writing my apology letter yet.

You're missing the part where they (maybe) showing a lack of evidence. I'd imagine our evidence is irrelevant if they are not able to present any substantial evidence of their own.

 

[chesterbells]

The more you think about it, the more it feels like this, is coming down to the none co-operation issue. Because that's probably the only thing they can contest, if everything else is falling in, around them.

Yes, that alone (if the case) has reputational damage value doesn’t it?

 

[Exeter Blue I am here]

He is not a presenter anymore. GB News unlike msm generally presents both sides of an issue but if you prefer to be fed news rather than form your own opinion carry on with BBC & Sly.

Some of the finest wummery I’ve seen in years!

 

[Blue_Lightsaber]

GB News unlike msm generally presents both sides of an issue

That's loony bin talk.

I prefer chatting with City fans, not loony bins.