And Conn was also heavily involved in parroting that narrative, which further hardens my suspicions that action was taken.It's certainly interesting to think about who the club have gone after legally.
In Winterbach's case, he was still trying to intimate he had evidence of our guilt shortly after the CAS verdict.
He can’t though. And I’m sure, as I said, that is what he what he will have been advised, assuming he’s asked the question.This all assumes that letters have been sent out. If they haven’t, he can pretty much read anything he likes out.
If a ‘club source’ says it then it must be true!
You could be right - but if this is the case then they are gonna have to own it at some point.The PL are hardly likely to say "Well actually, we've fucked up here and are trying to find a mutually acceptable way out" are they?
No more than City were ever likely to say "Despite all our protestations of innocence, we are bunch of lying cheats".
I've no doubt that the official line is that the hearing will still go ahead later this year. But I'm also in little doubt that the balance has significantly shifted in City's favour.
Not if he just says it was all for a laugh at the end and that there was never a letter.He can’t though. And I’m sure, as I said, that is what he what he will have been advised, assuming he’s asked the question.
I’d there’s no such letter and he reads a fictional one out then he’s in a world of pain and that is what I’m sure he’ll have been advised.
Based on the submitted accounts, this fictional character, unlike most of his cohort, has much to lose from being the subject of litigation.
We are 100% sure there is no actual evidence to suggest any letters have been issued. There is some rumour mongering amongst the usual attention seekers on social media.Are we 100% sure these letters have actually gone out?