But with the addition of Gail Platt’s embonpoint.People need to stop asking for this PM. It is literally the same information which did the rounds on here last week and was discussed to death.
But with the addition of Gail Platt’s embonpoint.People need to stop asking for this PM. It is literally the same information which did the rounds on here last week and was discussed to death.
I've done the same for what it's worth....You should read it. My thoughts below.
The tone of the article is biased. BBC are suppose to be impartial.
It's basically a big fuck off to City and what we've achieved.
It said the fine from CAS was largely due to non co-operation. My understanding is that it was only for that. Nothing else.
It mentions City got off at CAS due to time barring.
There's more but by the time I've written this we could all read it.
I have contacted City's media department and asked them to challenge the BBC about it too.
Funny how there’s no name attached to that article!Anyone else seen this? It's shocking journalism from the BBC (surprise, surprise) and there are material inaccuracies in it.
![]()
Man City 115 charges explained: What is latest on PSR & FFP charges?
A verdict on the 115 Manchester City Premier League charges could still be more than a year away - BBC Sport looks at the latest on the case.www.bbc.co.uk
Shit house seems to fitFunny how there’s no name attached to that article!
This is what tears taste like. Love it.Anyone else seen this? It's shocking journalism from the BBC (surprise, surprise) and there are material inaccuracies in it.
![]()
Man City 115 charges explained: What is latest on PSR & FFP charges?
A verdict on the 115 Manchester City Premier League charges could still be more than a year away - BBC Sport looks at the latest on the case.www.bbc.co.uk
Simon Stone then.Shit house seems to fit