PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Sid Snott said:
I've treated all this from day one just the same as transfer rumours over the years. Until you see the player in the Colin Bell stand with his number on his shirt and Bernard Halford with a pen and contract there's no story.
Click to expand...
Come on mate, you know as well as I do..


...when the cones come out, its a done deal.
 
jaiguruKun said:
Off the top of my head having only read it once it states:-

City dragged their feet and this is why it took four years for the PL to charge us

That we paid players more than what was in their contracts

That it is only a matter of time before we are punished

All with no evidence to support any of the above.
Click to expand...
No evidence published by BBC online to support any of these claims. Not even Der Spiegl made these claims. The Spiegl coverage was mostly speculation based on the emails. The BBC article has not taken account of the fact we were cleared of all the substantial allegations by three independent judges at CAS and their judgement made it clear there was no evidence to suggest a different decision would have been produced on the time-barred elements.The BBC emphasises the £10m fine for non-coperation but doesn't mention it was reduced by CAS from £30m because of our mitigation. The article is distorted, biased, unbalanced, and unfair.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.