PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Not a legal expert obviously, but surely that's contentious too?
City have submitted all the financial documents/records they are required to by the PL... if the PL are now saying there's something wrong, then it's up to them to prove it, I just don't see how City are legally required to supply anything more than they have?!
We also need to remember that the PL charged Everton for this too, and the IC threw it out
 
Not a legal expert obviously, but surely that's contentious too?
City have submitted all the financial documents/records they are required to by the PL... if the PL are now saying there's something wrong, then it's up to them to prove it, I just don't see how City are legally required to supply anything more than they have?!
Didn’t a judge order City to hand over documents that we were hanging on to?
 
Cease and desist is not something you use to stop fair comment there are some basics of free speech, it will never stop the discussion of 115 but will stop the cheat narrative that was sneaking in to some news outlets

And it’s never going to stop the click baiters or other fans

I said on the media thread that it stopped for a week. I’d imagine that’s enough time for legal advice to come back on allowable snide versus see you in court.
 
Ofcourse the last few pages is being driven up by certain gimmicky poster FFS.

When some blues learn to not takes his word seriously, i mean look at his freaking username for god sake.
 
Not a legal expert obviously, but surely that's contentious too?
City have submitted all the financial documents/records they are required to by the PL... if the PL are now saying there's something wrong, then it's up to them to prove it, I just don't see how City are legally required to supply anything more than they have?!
If Project River’s tease about non-cooperation a few weeks ago, which turned out to be about Forest rather than us, was accurate the Premier League were arguing that presenting documents not in their preferred format and insufficiently cross referenced amounted were worthy of being penalised. One step away from accusing them of failing to highlight in marker pen the bits that proved they were guilty
 
Talk Shite (Iknow, I know, I shouldn't) have just run a Scouse Kloppo love in, inviting comments from LFC fans on weather Kloppo is a PL legend or not.

Every bonehead who came on accused City of cheating, one stated, "City broke UEFA FFP 3 times" apparently which were the reasons Klopp only won 1 title.

Can they rely on proxys phoning in making statements indemnifying them from slanderous statements?
 
Thank you for an excellent summary. On Fordham, it should be noted that we negotiated with HMRC and were effectively cleared with no extra tax being levied. About six clubs were given tax levies, I am not sure whether those cases are still being argued about or whether they have paid the extra tax. None of those clubs have been charged by the PL.

I wasn't aware of that but I am not surprised. Our guys won't sneeze without getting legal and tax clearance.
 
Have we got a big game this weekend:

So far today sports media have reported:
Peps Leaving according to that united dickhead on "Football Terrace"
Keith Wyness and "Football Insider" have run with the bullshit promoted by the Swedish Rumble ****
Talk Shit have plenty of red scousers on each taking turns calling City "Cheats"

I suspect a bit of green eyed monster is doing the rounds. Sad Twats
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.