PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

One of the oddities regarding City's so-called failure to co-operate, that never gets mentioned, is that much of it could be predicated on frustration due to a presumption of guilt.

Just because someone from the PL demanded paperwork that they believed would blow the case wide open, it doesn't necessarily follow that such a smoking gun exists.

To conclude that therefore, City "must be" holding back the really damning stuff, is something of a fallacy.

Now, no more than the rest of us, I don't know what City did or did not provide. Still less do I know what the PL has actually requisitioned. I can only go on what I have read but there is now a lack of confidence, coupled with an undoubted whiff of petulance, emanating from much of the reporting on this case, that kind of has me leaning towards the above scenario.
 
You want an example about how the media are using this for click baiting, they would say it's a newsworthy story (it is) however there is actually no news in the article just the opinion of a lawyer, they might as well say it's possible that an asteroid could land in the centre circle of the pitch, now you get thousands of Plastic Dippers and Rags reading this and going away thinking this is the truth of the matter why because they read it, never mind that it's about a range of options but they don't see that, the media have found a gold mine

Click Bait
 
Ducado said:
You want an example about how the media are using this for click baiting, they would say it's a newsworthy story (it is) however there is actually no news in the article just the opinion of a lawyer, they might as well say it's possible that an asteroid could land in the centre circle of the pitch, now you get thousands of Plastic Dippers and Rags reading this and going away thinking this is the truth of the matter why because they read it, never mind that it's about a range of options but they don't see that, the media have found a gold mine

Click Bait
Click to expand...
Expulsion to non-league, what a crock of shite.
 
argyle said:
The letters thing was bullshit. Tolmie given incorrect information imo.
Click to expand...
Called 606 as i want to respond to Joe the Arsenal fan who had compared City to Lance Armstrong the producer Mike told me that they had to be very careful about what is said regarding the 115 as City had been in touch to remind them He didn't say more than that or, that a letter had been received but clearly City are watching
 
argyle said:
Free speech laws just protects them from being arrested by governments.

Not to spew biased drivel against a private organisation at will.

City can ban who they want. Imo they really should start banning people and stop giving sky and others access to players unless they stop being so biased against us.
Click to expand...
The club are contractually obliged to provide the manager and players for interviews to not do so would mean fines by the PL. The only exception was the Govern bully at Trafford who refused to speak to the BBC but they were all scared stiff of him to do anything about it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.