blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
FRIDAY... again.
Bit like Dallas eh? We will wake up one morning this thread will have disappeared and anyone you speak to will simply look puzzled and say “What charges?”Not real surely? Everything is AI nowadays. I'm starting to think these charges never existed.
Replaced by Arsenal's CEO Vinai Venkatesham, **** out, **** in.Just heard Levy has stood down - could there be any connection?
Perhaps I am just desperate
I know mate i was just being silly.One opinion does not a game, set and match make.
Even if it's probably right. But you can't deny the timing is odd. A few weeks ago he was lording it over Neville in his chairman's role. Thursday? International break? It does stink of a quick exit out the back door for some reason ....
FRIDAY... again.
Why go three games in though?Is there such a thing as a “slow” resignation ffs how desperate / paranoid are we
Spurs have been after him for years they were more distracted by wanting him out as we witnessed first hand the other week hardly celebrated their annual gift from us all we heard was they want Levy out
If another cartel club have another resignation in the next week or so I will fall in line again
Well he’s not. Not unless he wants to lose some of his wealthDoubt Levy will go quietly regardless of verdict. He’s free to say what he wants now and not worry about the politics.
I’m with you on this. If he has dragged the Lewis’s family name through the mud on this case. And they’ve had a slight whiff of the outcome. And ts only understandable that they’d want him outThe timing and speed is noteworthy to say the least. I don’t think anyone can definitively say it’s absolutely nothing to do with City, but there are a host of other just as likely explanations. I’d say it’s possible but unlikely.
Still good news overall, I’d say. He was unquestionably an agent provocateur when it came to City. Pep certainly thinks so.
If those emails that the panel requested show anything youd put money on levy being front and centre for it.People saying it is to do with City, what could have happened that was so bad from the outcome that he had to resign?
Thats what i dont get , they had a reasonably good start to the season and they had him oversee the new manager and the summer signings and then hes out the door, in any industry when someone has 25 years of service, especially if they are in the upper echelon of that industry its reasonable to suggest that there would be some kind of transition period.Why go three games in though?
Details of emails from him released to City's legal team about to be cited in the outcome judgement.People saying it is to do with City, what could have happened that was so bad from the outcome that he had to resign?
Why go three games in though?
The timing raises a number of perfectly legitimate questions.Thats what i dont get , they had a reasonably good start to the season and they had him oversee the new manager and the summer signings and then hes out the door, in any industry when someone has 25 years of service, especially if they are in the upper echelon of that industry its reasonable to suggest that there would be some kind of transition period.
very much so, for someone with 25 years under their belt to just walk out the door with zero transition period or handover and for them to go business as usual, nothing to see here is mind boggling.The timing raises a number of perfectly legitimate questions.