PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[flb]

This is where the money advantage argument falls flat in front of me. Txiki and pep has done a wonderful set of business and signed some fantastic low risk players and pep done the rest with his magic. Tbf pep has advantage not coz of money but he a fucking goat.He attracts players who genuinely wants to play for the best of the best and rest of cunts can not cope with that simple fact.

There is a reason why Ferguson courted him to be there next manager , something else that is never talked about when Pep is accused “he can’t win things without Messi or money “.

 

[Blueboy73]

And now this knob jockey pipes up. View attachment 119899
Sad **** whose only relevance today is slagging City off with such unsubstantiated shit

Another fuckwit who's apparently not arsed about City going out of his way to tell everyone he's not arsed about City.

 

[halfcenturyup]

If I had to to surmise and there are far better posters than me on here, is it they're trying to enforce 2019 rules into 2011 alleged breaches.
If there's no compromise and a full hearing goes ahead and either party appeal we could still be 18 months away, not good for City and there's no way Masters could survive that.

There was a press report that City had sought clarification that rules changes couldn't be applied retrospectively. I would have thought this was a pretty straight forward point of law. This could have been something to do with Mancini, or to the provision of external information, I think. But we don't know yet.

If the panel concludes in the autumn as people expect with a decision early next year, there will be a detailed report at that time, even if there is a later appeal, so we will know what has been going on.

I wouldn't worry about City. Delays don't really affect the club at all. They affect the fans more. But they affect the PL the most. It's so stupid of them to let it get this far.

 

[mancity2012_eamo]

Clichy played for us and Henry played for Pep, Owen even though he's a crap pundit and his rag dipper connections doesn't seem to hate City that much.

That’s what threw me.
Wasn’t expecting such positivity from Owen.
The other two, yes. It’s understandable.
But Henry in particular, gave great insight. He was extremely complimentary about the football intellect of Kev.
It was really refreshing to hear pundits just talk about the football they see in front of them, and to rate it properly in the context of history and consistency.

 

[BlueRockape]

And now this knob jockey pipes up. View attachment 119899
Sad **** whose only relevance today is slagging City off with such unsubstantiated shit

A total fukin nut job raw chicken eating twat
A typical kind of twat the rags have as players

 

[reddishblue]

 

[ysmsa]

Even he can’t afford the price of a pie at the ground anymore.

Ha ha,

However, I do like a Steak Pie at the ground and it's about a fiver.

I had pie and chips from the Chippy before the game on Sunday.

Pie £2.50 and literally half the size of the City pie, they do not compare size or quality wise.

 

[Bellamy's Caddy]

Thanks for sharing. That's one of the most insightful and balanced articles I've read on City in years. Fascinating to learn how key moments in the season played out and although the charges are mentioned, it isn't done in a snide or defamatory way. It's a shame this type of coverage of City is so few and far between.

And for the lurking 'journalists' on here (you know who you are) this is how to write an article. Perhaps there's a reason it was published in the Times and not the two bit rags you work for.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Fair play, they keep coming

We've just achieved something never before achieved in English football history, to add to the domestic treble and 100 points. This Pep team is immortal and will be remembered long, long after Neal Maupay (who's achieved fuck all in his career) is forgotten.

 

[pauls]

There was a press report that City had sought clarification that rules changes couldn't be applied retrospectively. I would have thought this was a pretty straight forward point of law. This could have been something to do with Mancini, or to the provision of external information, I think. But we don't know yet.

If the panel concludes in the autumn as people expect with a decision early next year, there will be a detailed report at that time, even if there is a later appeal, so we will know what has been going on.

I wouldn't worry about City. Delays don't really affect the club at all. They affect the fans more. But they affect the PL the most. It's so stupid of them to let it get this far.

They

There was a press report that City had sought clarification that rules changes couldn't be applied retrospectively. I would have thought this was a pretty straight forward point of law. This could have been something to do with Mancini, or to the provision of external information, I think. But we don't know yet.

If the panel concludes in the autumn as people expect with a decision early next year, there will be a detailed report at that time, even if there is a later appeal, so we will know what has been going on.

I wouldn't worry about City. Delays don't really affect the club at all. They affect the fans more. But they affect the PL the most. It's so stupid of them to let it get this far.

They gambled that Everton and Forest would absorb points deductions, unfortunately Luton or Burnley could muster enough so they would be tied up in more Litigation and legal costs.