PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

City_In_Chicago said:
I hate to say it, but the "there will be zero ambiguity" line should be a major red flag for anyone inclined to believe this person.
Click to expand...
Why? I don’t understand your post.

It’s only your 45th in ten years so I figure you only post when you have a tremendous amount of value to add.
 
FogBlueInSanFran said:
Why? I don’t understand your post.
Click to expand...
The line just reaches too far. Is he really saying the IC will say the charges were entirely made up? Otherwise rivals will find ambiguity. For that matter, how does he know how the IC will rule, even if City does have all the evidence they need? I don't trust them or their "independence" at all. This is coming from someone who thinks the rules themselves are a fraud, btw.
 
City_In_Chicago said:
Something I don't think many people realize when it comes to the PL and their "brand" - the PL was created as a breakaway league, instigated by the then-elite clubs, to hoard more money and titles for themselves. They simply aren't going to tolerate an interloper like City coming in and destroying them all. That's why these "rules" were put in place to start. I mean, rules that allow some clubs to legally spend more than others? Are you serious?

So, while I'm sure the PL would prefer not to have these charges casting a shadow, it's not their biggest priority. Their biggest priority is ensuring City can't continue to dominate. That is everything to them. So they had nothing to lose pursuing these charges come what may.
Click to expand...
They probably didn't have Chelsea on their minds then either as they were no more influential than us and it was only Russian money that launched them.
 
I'm no cynic but... said:
They probably didn't have Chelsea on their minds then either as they were no more influential than us and it was only Russian money that launched them.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I mean any club that wants to keep up with the established elite will have to invest money. The elite clubs did it before there was any thought to rules that would limit it. The difference between Chelsea and City tho is that the former just threw money around while City invested for the long term on every level. That's what scares the elite the most.
 
I heard Simon Jordan say the other day that he thinks there will be a settlement so that both clubs can get out of this tangled situation that we find ourselves in,

But I don’t agree with him, I think we will want total exoneration and clearance of are name, I even think the non cooperation will not be accepted by us either,

Its win or bust for us on these charges, I actually think it’s a bigger result for us than whatever happens on Saturday,

If we do get a unanimous decision in are favour of a not guilty win, then I am gonna hire out Mary D’s with all drinks at £1:15,

That will really boil the piss of every cry baby rival lol,
 
Joe Donachie said:
I heard Simon Jordan say the other day that he thinks there will be a settlement so that both clubs can get out of this tangled situation that we find ourselves in,

But I don’t agree with him, I think we will want total exoneration and clearance of are name, I even think the non cooperation will not be accepted by us either,

Its win or bust for us on these charges, I actually think it’s a bigger result for us than whatever happens on Saturday,

If we do get a unanimous decision in are favour of a not guilty win, then I am gonna hire out Mary D’s with all drinks at £1:15,

That will really boil the piss of every cry baby rival lol,
Click to expand...
How about them floodlights or the wideness of the pitch!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.