Right - unless the IC has talked to this person directly, before they've even had the hearing, then we should ignore it. Doesn't mean we won't be cleared, just that this person wouldn't know and would be highly unlikely the IC themselves even know how they'll rule at this point.You'll get a lot of stick for your posts but that is a very good point.
Unless it's all done and dusted now there is no way of knowing what the judgement of the IC will be in advance of it sitting. Certainly not in terms of it stating that they is zero evidence of anything the club have been accused of leaving no ambiguity whatsoever.
Except it wasn't stated as an opinion, it was stated as an ITK fact.It's opinions though, isn't it? Someone at the club or tolmie believes there will be zero ambiguity. There is no perfect insight because there can't be.
Vienna?Zero ambiguity LEGALLY. Obviously there will be ambiguity among our many detractors. But quite frankly that doesn't mean a fucking thing to me...
I'm not reading it as a fact. How can it be. It's someone's opinionExcept it wasn't stated as an opinion, it was stated as an ITK fact.
I think the club would tell Pep to personally run the ball into our own net on Saturday if it meant non-cooperation, a smallish fine, and a statement that claimed the paperwork satisfied that that no major breaches had happened, all the sponsorship and player contracts were perfectly legal, and that the league and club were ready to draw a line under any and all previous FFP irregularities.I heard Simon Jordan say the other day that he thinks there will be a settlement so that both clubs can get out of this tangled situation that we find ourselves in,
But I don’t agree with him, I think we will want total exoneration and clearance of are name, I even think the non cooperation will not be accepted by us either,
Its win or bust for us on these charges, I actually think it’s a bigger result for us than whatever happens on Saturday,
If we do get a unanimous decision in are favour of a not guilty win, then I am gonna hire out Mary D’s with all drinks at £1:15,
That will really boil the piss of every cry baby rival lol,
Well it won’t be the turkey doing the gobbling !Xmas is going to be tense in their gaff.
Tolmie is very good for mood music from the club itself. I've no doubt there's people in the club that think this is a matter of time. But there were people in the club, and therefore Tolmie as well, who thought we all but had Bellingham's signature on paper. It's not done till it's done.Last year I remember Tolmie saying with certainty that Erling was coming to City. There were those who believed him and those who most certainly did not and were keen to make sure everyone knew it. Gradually Tolmie explained that he knew this not because of something he'd heard but because of something he had seen. Some time after Erling had signed he explained that he had seen forms concerning his medical insurance. This tells us that Tolmie is not an animated ventriloquist's dummy who simply repeats willy nilly what he hears but someone with contacts who listens and then evaluates it as evidence. This tweet is very definite, Tolmie is very sure and even though he hasn't identified the source we all know Tolmie well enough to know that we would be very wise to take it very seriously. I am certain one of the first things Tolmie has asked is if his source(s) is/are in a position to know or express a valid opinion and he must be satisfied on this point. Does experience show their opinion to be an informed and trustworthy one? If Tolmie is satisfied that the source is both credible and reliable. That doesn't mean that what Tolmie says will inevitably come to pass but it is to be taken seriously and is very encouraging. From me, and many others, thank you Tolmiw.