Just while you're here Stefan, if you could perhaps add your input to a point I made yesterday (apologies if it sounds obvious or may have already been made previously).
Much is being made regarding the second batch of leaked emails which have appeared since CAS.
However, under oath at CAS, with highly experienced lawyers and highly knowledgeable executives providing evidence in our defence, wouldn't it seem definite that they'd have been all too aware that Der Spiegel/Pinto may be in possession of many many more emails which had potential to be leaked in future (now have) so answered questions appropriately so as not to perjure themselves?
IE the potential for further leaked emails would likely have strongly been taken into consideration when they gave their testimony, so the likelihood of them deliberately lying reduces even further?
