PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

It’s an interesting one as the key auditors are those at the sponsors and ADUG. I really don’t understand how the PL think they can prove anything without full access to the sponsors.
I see the PL have added a rule that clubs must try to get third parties to cough up evidence. “Hey, sheik, can we see your bank account?”
 
I see the PL have added a rule that clubs must try to get third parties to cough up evidence. “Hey, sheik, can we see your bank account?”
They have already been pretty unequivocal both in witness evidence and in writing including in their original statement which referred to their audit 1717394622891.png
 
I see the PL have added a rule that clubs must try to get third parties to cough up evidence. “Hey, sheik, can we see your bank account?”

Remember the club were reported to have sought confirmation that changes to the rules shouldn't be applied to previous periods? That may be why.

1000000348.png

It's important, I think, because without that new rule, the club can provide the external counter-evidence it wants, when it wants. With that rule, the PL can ask for what it wants and the club has to present it (when able to do so) or be non-cooperative.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.