PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[eastmanc]

Do you sway that sarcastically, or genuinely? Just so I know whether to click it or not to waste my time.

It's pretty balanced, which is really hard to find on the internet, got the facts right as I understand them

 

[BeerIsTheBest]

What’s the leak?

It was in the Titanic and sank the ship.

 

[Stoned Rose]

I put it down to @projectriver , well done Stefan.

Ruthlessly cuntish but gently delivered. Well in SB.

 

[Stoned Rose]

Looks like a pipsqueak, how the fuck did he get to become a cop!

 

[remember arthur mann]

Ruthlessly cuntish but gently delivered. Well in SB.

My sentiments too. The knife gently delivered then turned.

 

[cheekybids]

But this was leaked on the arbitrators' watch. This is different. Definitely a kick in the bollocks for the arbitrators.

Can you add a bit more context to this?

 

[halfcenturyup]

Can you add a bit more context to this?

The PL got permission from the arbitrators to inform the clubs of the claim, so they could contribute to the PL's defence. They needed this because the claim is supposed to be confidential. So if the PL sent it to someone who leaked it, it doesn't just reflect on the PL, but on the arbitrators as well.

I would imagine they are furious to have been treated like that.

 

[city2]

I put it down to @projectriver , well done Stefan.

The little **** has been sacked and about time, got to big for his slippers.

 

[cheekybids]

The PL got permission from the arbitrators to inform the clubs of the claim, so they could contribute to the PL's defence. They needed this because the claim is supposed to be confidential. So if the PL sent it to someone who leaked it, it doesn't just reflect on the PL, but on the arbitrators as well.

I would imagine they are furious to have been treated like that.

Furious to start an investigation & lay charges?

 

[halfcenturyup]

Furious to start an investigation & lay charges?

Am I in the wrong thread? :)

Edit: Or do you mean the arbitrators could investigate and charge the PL? Not sure they can do that. Although they can require the PL to investigate if it is relevant to the case ie showing discrimination and targeted action, I suppose.