failsworthblueboy
Well-Known Member
You must have been able to see through him ;-)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 9,880
Id agree but for some reason I already muted him a while back. Cant remember why but must have been a twat.
Spooky…..
Excellent listen. Thanks Stefan.... and Kieran who is always fair about City.
Contrast to that loon Nick Harris.
LeonardoDaVnci
Well-Known Member
Irrespective of political persuasion, most people would accept journos who write in The Spectator are itk. This week an article re God's own team appeared. The general tone was the good people of England would find a "City are innocent" outcome as unacceptable and even inconceivable. The article states the sensible action would be for City to "just" take a hit of 20 points (same magic number 20 apqears again) so that all concerned can move on and leave all this unpleasantness behind.
Very weird article. But could it be the journo was briefed that the charges are toast ? The PL are now trying to spin a bull shit story that a settlement is the ONLY solution to avoid a back lash ?. Another desperate attempt by the PL to force a bu115hit narrative, but we maintain our position, either prove your charges or drop them NO SETTLEMENT means NO SETTLEMENT.
Very weird article. But could it be the journo was briefed that the charges are toast ? The PL are now trying to spin a bull shit story that a settlement is the ONLY solution to avoid a back lash ?. Another desperate attempt by the PL to force a bu115hit narrative, but we maintain our position, either prove your charges or drop them NO SETTLEMENT means NO SETTLEMENT.
The Spectator long ceased to be other than a Tory rag.Irrespective of political persuasion, most people would accept journos who write in The Spectator are itk. This week an article re God's own team appeared. The general tone was the good people of England would find a "City are innocent" outcome as unacceptable and even inconceivable. The article states the sensible action would be for City to "just" take a hit of 20 points (same magic number 20 apqears again) so that all concerned can move on and leave all this unpleasantness behind.
Very weird article. But could it be the journo was briefed that the charges are toast ? The PL are now trying to spin a bull shit story that a settlement is the ONLY solution to avoid a back lash ?. Another desperate attempt by the PL to force a bu115hit narrative, but we maintain our position, either prove your charges or drop them NO SETTLEMENT means NO SETTLEMENT.
Bald fraud
Well-Known Member
Aren’t the rags supplying evidence for the premier league in their case against us?Laying the groundwork for when the case collapses for a more cordial relationship with the rags and move masters on for Britain to take over. He is toast.
Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 15,962
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I read that article. Nothing but pure poison. They might be itk but they want us hung drawn and quartered.Irrespective of political persuasion, most people would accept journos who write in The Spectator are itk. This week an article re God's own team appeared. The general tone was the good people of England would find a "City are innocent" outcome as unacceptable and even inconceivable. The article states the sensible action would be for City to "just" take a hit of 20 points (same magic number 20 apqears again) so that all concerned can move on and leave all this unpleasantness behind.
Very weird article. But could it be the journo was briefed that the charges are toast ? The PL are now trying to spin a bull shit story that a settlement is the ONLY solution to avoid a back lash ?. Another desperate attempt by the PL to force a bu115hit narrative, but we maintain our position, either prove your charges or drop them NO SETTLEMENT means NO SETTLEMENT.
Probably has a few skeletons in his closetId agree but for some reason I already muted him a while back. Cant remember why but must have been a twat.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
He better not start with me as I'll kick him right in the ghoulies.Id agree but for some reason I already muted him a while back. Cant remember why but must have been a twat.
I presume this was written with tongue firmly in cheek?Irrespective of political persuasion, most people would accept journos who write in The Spectator are itk.