You know what! if this had happened (allegations of overspending -whatever the fuck) to another team, I swear to god I wouldn’t be shouting 'throw them out!', or, insisting they have their history airbrushed out - we fight till the end, and if we go down, we go down together. They touch our trophy cabinet and it's a riot!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 14,327
His media mates.Who are these "most people" folk?
GaudinoMotors
Well-Known Member
Ha yes - like we should be using Lizars!This is just ridiculous now
The governing body of your sport throws accusations at you and the cost of hiring the quality of lawyer needed to have a fight in the game is held up as further evidence of your wrong doing. You must be guilty because you need an expensive lawyer
preposterous
Beswick Prize Bands Big Drum
Well-Known Member
If the press ask any questions to the players or Pep about the investigation, then they should look them straight in the eyes and not say a word until they change the subject.
Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 13,247
True but identifying related party transactions usually require shareholders to declare them - if related parties are non identifiable (offshore or nominee companies) coupled with shareholders failing to declare such then it’s impossible to recognise those transactions
Depends
If the auditor is aware of potential related party transactions from other sources they can ask for further info, and if they aren't satisfied with what they get they can refuse to sign off the accounts.
chesterbells
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 22,648
Agreed. I those circumstances surely their judgement/sanctions would follow on from any HMRC outcome.If such evidence exists I really don't think HMRC and the authorities would be waiting for the PL to pass judgement.
My point is I don't think the PL has such evidence as their allegations are so serious it should/would have already been taken up by the authorities.
Last edited:
Need some good banners like this but slagging off the hateful 8:
View attachment 68397
View attachment 68398
HelloCity
Well-Known Member
cant open it, What is it?
Went through to a dick pic for me.
how much of a punishment would it take to dismantle our foundations and status ? relegation to the championship, transfer ban of 3 seasons or more, all would take years to rebuild, with the manager players could leave,
my feelings are they will want to punish Manchester city hard that it would take over 5 years to rebuild,
United and Liverpool would love 5 years of top 4 place without little challenges from arsenal and Newcastle and Chelsea,
the damage a transfer ban of 3 years would not hurt that much ? but add relegation to the pot, then it will be over
just think of the mess we would be in ? players leaving, manager leaving, lost revenue, it would be a disaster,
I even think our owners could sell up and say enough is enough,
my feelings are they will want to punish Manchester city hard that it would take over 5 years to rebuild,
United and Liverpool would love 5 years of top 4 place without little challenges from arsenal and Newcastle and Chelsea,
the damage a transfer ban of 3 years would not hurt that much ? but add relegation to the pot, then it will be over
just think of the mess we would be in ? players leaving, manager leaving, lost revenue, it would be a disaster,
I even think our owners could sell up and say enough is enough,