PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I've long suspected this could be the case. The way they changed the APT rules to entitle themselves to third party documentation also supports this point.

As did the change in guidelines to the PL rules regarding providing information halfway through the investigation to include a requirement for the club to get third party information "when able to do so" (clever wording when they know we were able to do so at CAS).

As did the challenge the club made against applying new rules to a historic investigation after the allegations were referred.

As did the commercial court hearing which stated that the PL had asked for information from external parties.

So yes, very likely that non-cooperation will centre around the provision of third party information, along with deliberately delaying the investigative process, which is something the PL accused the club of in the commercial court hearing.
 
Last edited:
Clearly it depends on the regulations we are found to have broken and the sanctions imposed but let's not forget that in 1919 Leeds City FC were forcibly disbanded in 1919 in response to allegations of financial irregularities regarding illegal payments to players during WW!. They were expelled from the league in 1919 largely because the club's directors refused to cooperate with the FA inquiry and refused to hand over the club's financial records. Allegations, non-cooperation ... sound familiar?
No, not really
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.