deano ou812
Well-Known Member
Yeah if it wasn’t for those pesky City kids we’d have found them guiltyThat pesky fuckin’ evidence again!
Yeah if it wasn’t for those pesky City kids we’d have found them guiltyThat pesky fuckin’ evidence again!
Yes, and once we have gone then the EPL will effectively be a permanent three team league which will die through a lack of interest.It’s funny PSR/FFP is there to stop clubs going out of business (allegedly).
But the PL, the media and all the other clubs are trying to do just that.
They don’t just want us relegated they want us gone, permanently.
BBC like clockwork yet again…Pep Guardiola says people expect Manchester City to be 'wiped from face of Earth' over alleged breaches
Pep Guardiola says people expect to see Manchester City wiped "off the face of the Earth" over the club's alleged financial rule breaches.www.bbc.co.uk
But surely PB the premier league’s legal advisors would be coming across with the same view would they not be advising them on this that it is a no no,they can’t be that stupid to not take proper legal advice surely and run with something that may make them look a laughing stock..As you well know, you don't use a witness who can harm your case more than they can help it. I can't believe they expect to land the Mancini-related charges.
Given the outcome at CAS, I also can't believe they expect they can land the sponsorship charges. If I'm right that they knew about Fordham back in 2015, and neither UEFA nor the PL did anything at the time or subsequently, then they surely can't be confident they can land that either. So why do this?
We've speculated that it's just to damage our reputation, which looks more and more like a rational explanation, plus they might hope to get us on the non-cooperation allegations. Given the cost of this to the PL, if I was one of the non-cartel member clubs of the PL, I'd be asking some very searching questions once this is over.
I wonder if the rest of the media are running with a similar headline. If so Pep's team talk for tomorrow is nearly done. Just needs to develop the siege mentality a bit furtherView attachment 132536
Even more hilarious/bent when you see the actual screenshot of the headline
City said in the official statement that they have "Comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence". I have always wondered what that might be..? Is it Audit report, Bank transaction details, Full chain of email conversations or something else...?
What's your thought on that, PB....?
As you well know, you don't use a witness who can harm your case more than they can help it. I can't believe they expect to land the Mancini-related charges.
Given the outcome at CAS, I also can't believe they expect they can land the sponsorship charges. If I'm right that they knew about Fordham back in 2015, and neither UEFA nor the PL did anything at the time or subsequently, then they surely can't be confident they can land that either. So why do this?
We've speculated that it's just to damage our reputation, which looks more and more like a rational explanation, plus they might hope to get us on the non-cooperation allegations. Given the cost of this to the PL, if I was one of the non-cartel member clubs of the PL, I'd be asking some very searching questions once this is over.
I'm not sure that logic or reason play much part in the PL's approach deano.But surely PB the premier league’s legal advisors would be coming across with the same view would they not be advising them on this that it is a no no,they can’t be that stupid to not take proper legal advice surely and run with something that may make them look a laughing stock..
I really love Pep's mentality, especially the phrase “I want to defend my club, …”