PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Coatigan]

Are you two going to be carrying on again like the other week? If so can you do it over PM please?

You got something better to do?

 

[ufo]

Jordan is the mouthpiece of certain PL CEO’s and owners. It was obvious this week that he has had a push to press on certain issues regarding the 115 case.

The blokes integrity has been blown out of the water already this week. His regular snide comments on Frank Warren and Eddie Hearn - and magically it conspires that he’s in bed financially as an investor with Ben Shalom.

I wonder when his football link up will be exposed ?

I googled “Jordon’s mouth piece “and all the results are same picture with a man eating dildo.

 

[ufo]

View attachment 133091

Please find this fantastic artist and give a massive statue asap

 

[Xhavenjoe]

Please find this fantastic artist and give a massive statue asap

Just hoping its not Rolf Harris

 

[halfcenturyup]

7.1 just states the terms have been set out and written down in proper contract. It has fuck all to do with money or how he's paid. If city had a contract with Mancini then that is it.

What's happened, and this is by clear evidence, is the Premier League, like yourself, have tried to apply 2023 rules back to 2009 to 2013. We know that happened due to the ridiculous public release statement that was rushed out. They then had to backtrack and rerelease it months later correcting the content but they still kept the original charge in, as they had to otherwise they'd look stupid but they did changed the numbers for each rule book.

They quoted

for each of Seasons 2009/10 to 2012/13 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those Seasons requiring a member club to include full details of manager remuneration in its relevant contracts with its manager, namely:
(1) for Seasons 2009/10 to 2011/12 inclusive, Premier League Rules Q.7 and Q.8; and
(2) for Season 2012/13, Premier League Rules P.7 and P.8; and

which is the 2023 definition of the rules but mention Q7 and Q8 of the handbook which also states a contract is written. So for me and probably everyone else this just doesn't stand up at all legally. The Premier have 100% fucked up on this bit of the charge sheet.

I'll also add nothing illegal has happened here, a manager can have two contracts with two different organisations for tax burden reduction purposes. Which is why all of this Mancini stuff will end up being not guilty due to the statute of limitation anyway

For the sake of peace and harmony, I will say that I agree with the very last sentence. Well, apart from the fact there is no statute of limitations in English law. Oh, and it won't be not guilty, it will be not proven.

 

[Bournemouth Blue]

Never has a club with so much recent success had so many unhappy supporters…….

 

[Elbow beards]

Please find this fantastic artist and give a massive statue asap

Ai mate, it ain't real

 

[ufo]

Ai mate, it ain't real

Even AI hates rags

 

[ufo]

Some examples of Sui Genesis:
4 in a row.
100 points.
32 wins in a PL season.
23 consecutive home wins.
20 consecutive away wins.
12 consecutive away PL wins.
10 consecutive wins in UEFA competitions.
11 CL games won in a season.
25 consecutive games unbeaten in CL.
32 unbeaten games at home in CL.
169 goals in a season.
106 goals in a PL season.
36 league wins a calendar year.
19 away league wins in a calendar year.
Not forgetting being relegated the year after winning the top division.

I sometimes forget what a privilege it is supporting this team……

Agreed ! I can feel it in the air tonight and against all odds , it feels like another day in paradise

 

[Chris in London]

Moreover any judgment will be reserved. They won’t be making any decisions during the hearing.

They certainly will.

They just won't tell anyone yet

;)