You are right. I refer to "grown ups" in a derogatory way regarding senior people at Sky. It's a pisstake.I think he meant high ups. Doesn’t otherwise make sense.
You are right. I refer to "grown ups" in a derogatory way regarding senior people at Sky. It's a pisstake.I think he meant high ups. Doesn’t otherwise make sense.
Please find this fantastic artist and give a massive statue asap
On that point would that mean that till such time as all the evidence has been put forward there wouldn’t even be a ruling re if matters were time barred?Moreover any judgment will be reserved. They won’t be making any decisions during the hearing.
I'm no solicitor but i would think the first thing to do would be to decide which of the allegations, if any, are time barred to save time unnecesarily deliberating them.On that point would that mean that till such time as all the evidence has been put forward there wouldn’t even be a ruling re if matters were time barred?
My reading of the CAS hearing was that they very much determined matters re time prior to fully exploring the charges that were too old.
apart from the fact it does https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/58 you're right again lolFor the sake of peace and harmony, I will say that I agree with the very last sentence. Well, apart from the fact there is no statute of limitations in English law. Oh, and it won't be not guilty, it will be not proven.
To do that they still have to hear the whole case around the charges and work out if any fraud or concealment has taken place (cooking the books) or whether the premier league already knew about the details (like Fordham). If they can't prove that then statue of limitations apply. I seriously doubt they can prove any fraud happened because most likely it didn't. Why would the Execs at city and multiple other well respected businesses commit fraud when there was no need to.I'm no solicitor but i would think the first thing to do would be to decide which of the allegations, if any, are time barred to save time unnecesarily deliberating them.
I think all the evidence has to heard in order to determine whether there's been fraud and concealment i.e. if there is an exception to the general 6-year limitation period.I'm no solicitor but i would think the first thing to do would be to decide which of the allegations, if any, are time barred to save time unnecesarily deliberating them.
What are you two gonna do when this thread finally closes?apart from the fact it does https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/58 you're right again lol
I did not know Omar did street art!Found @tolmie's hairdoo 's source!
Agreed ! I can feel it in the air tonight and against all odds , it feels like another day in paradise