PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Since the arbitration started have there been any photos in the press?

I ask because of this putative ten week time estimate. Where did it come from? How reliable is that time estimate?

This could already be over.

Maybe I’m wrong and there’s some verifiable record of such a time estimate. Happy to apologise if my gut is wrong.

Where did this ten weeks come from?
 
Since the arbitration started have there been any photos in the press?

I ask because of this putative ten week time estimate. Where did it come from? How reliable is that time estimate?

This could already be over.

Maybe I’m wrong and there’s some verifiable record of such a time estimate. Happy to apologise if my gut is wrong.

Where did this ten weeks come from?

Would there be any point sending a photographer twice? It would just be the same shot of a grinning Pannick walking into court, the only difference being he might be wearing a different tie.
 
Would there be any point sending a photographer twice? It would just be the same shot of a grinning Pannick walking into court, the only difference being he might be wearing a different tie.
Yes, I fully accept that, but other witnesses might have been of interest. Although they might not enter via the main entrance.

My main point was the ten week time limit. It’s become received wisdom, but where was it first mooted? What is the provenance and veracity of that time estimate?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.