Yes, I fully accept that, but other witnesses might have been of interest. Although they might not enter via the main entrance.
My main point was the ten week time limit. It’s become received wisdom, but where was it first mooted? What the provenance and veracity of that time estimate?
Yes, I fully accept that, but other witnesses might have been of interest. Although they might not enter via the main entrance.
My main point was the ten week time limit. It’s become received wisdom, but where was it first mooted? What the provenance and veracity of that time estimate?
I met the second mr k in tunisia , in the hotel piano bar , instant love , he is scottish not tunisian , i moved across the country for him and we were married for fifteen years
Because the 'paparazzi' were outside the IRDC on day one, the attendees started to use the rear entrance (no smut, please). The majority of witnesses will probably appear by video, maybe even HHSM ?Would there be any point sending a photographer twice? It would just be the same shot of a grinning Pannick walking into court, the only difference being he might be wearing a different tie.
Seems ridiculously long to me.From what I recall it was reported as 10 weeks at the same time it was leaked the tribunal would start in September. The fact that turned out to be true suggests the 10 weeks is also true.
But not sure it was ever officially confirmed and I think I also remember Stefan saying 10 weeks is an inordinately long time for a tribunal.
Looks like hes got the hump to meAt Enfida waiting for flight..hope they had a lovely time..we did..bloke on beach who did camel rides was telling me his son is a huge City fan ..watches games on TV etc..bloke knew all players names etc..he wanted my old City shirt for his son ..gave him two of them..he's wearing it on beach lol
Except it won't be water!I’m hoping on the last day he wears a bow tie that spins round and squirts water into Masters’ face
Who the hell knows...I'm with you. Where did this 10 week estimate come from? Many have said 10 to 12 weeks. I don't care how "complicated" these issues are supposed to be, that seems like an awfully long time, especially since we're said to have irrefutable evidence...seems to me the Prem are being allowed to bombard us with an interminable amount of shit looking for anything imaginable to possibly stick. An effin' joke...Since the arbitration started have there been any photos in the press?
I ask because of this putative ten week time estimate. Where did it come from? How reliable is that time estimate?
This could already be over.
Maybe I’m wrong and there’s some verifiable record of such a time estimate. Happy to apologise if my gut is wrong.
Where did this ten weeks come from?
Think the 10 weeks was an estimate based on, insider knowledge of how long the lawyers, had booked time for the case, it could over run, but at the rate the PL evidence is getting ripped up it could end sooner, one thing for sure, the breaks for cuppas, will make sure the lawyers get paid the full amount.Since the arbitration started have there been any photos in the press?
I ask because of this putative ten week time estimate. Where did it come from? How reliable is that time estimate?
This could already be over.
Maybe I’m wrong and there’s some verifiable record of such a time estimate. Happy to apologise if my gut is wrong.
Where did this ten weeks come from?
12th August, there was an article in the Times by Ziegler and Lawton regarding the forthcoming start of the 115 hearing. Can't see any earlier reference to 10 weeks.Since the arbitration started have there been any photos in the press?
I ask because of this putative ten week time estimate. Where did it come from? How reliable is that time estimate?
This could already be over.
Maybe I’m wrong and there’s some verifiable record of such a time estimate. Happy to apologise if my gut is wrong.
Where did this ten weeks come from?