PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[wattle]

At least this will get rid of half the cunts on the pre and post match forum yesterday. Cherio

 

[SWPISHOME]

It’s my last season. With the season ticket, Sky Sports, BT Sports, Sky Bet in a cost of living crisis with their corrupt product, they can fuck off. I know the team haven’t been at it this season, but the officiating has been as obvious as a cock on a nun. They’re fucking desperate for us not to win this league. That along with City staff and their attitude to legacy fans, I’ve no stomach to fight for them. A league run by bent, corrupt thundercunts.

I absolutely love City being going since a kid, The past few seasons has really gotten to me (even though we won numerous trophies) it's more so all the corruption and media ect...I don't have the head for it all anymore.

I'm in the same boat after this season is up I'm going to knock it on the head. No more taking time away from the kids to watch a bunch of corrupt wankers.

 

[jollylescott]

Nick Harris is a shit stirring ****. Stefan has only said IF the charges are proven and to be fair, IF we are guilty of all 98 then we can't argue if the book gets thrown at us. Personally, I reckon most of them are bollocks though

Of that you can be guaranteed!

 

[Chippy_boy]

What I don't understand is this. Before the PL would allow Chelsea to be bought by Todd Boehly. He had to prove that he had 1.7billion ringfenced that was purely allocated for Chelsea. This gave them financial stability in terms of long term survival, so that they couldn't just suddenly go bust if Boehly walked away.

So why didn't ADUG just do the same? Here is the money, it is ringfenced and the club have access to it in perpetuity?

Instead of all the snide sponsorship deals between, brothers, uncles, cousins, that can all be traced straight back to ADUG.

Have a read up on FFP mate. The rules were put in place to ensure only the historically top clubs could dominate their respective leagues, in perpetuity. So they prevent all clubs from spending more than they earn (more or less). Since the G14 generated more revenue than the others, the idea being they'd always be able to spend more than the others.

Boehly could have $100bn in his back pocket and it would make no difference as under FFP rules, he's not allowed to spend it.

Sponsorship money however, is "earned" and therefore can be used to finance the club's spending.

 

[bluemoon32]

I've got mine, just like last time

I'll just say i was there............like most of the cunts on this site ha

 

[CC1]

I’m not saying we should nor am I offering any insight.
Just if it is in the rules, we should expect the book to be thrown at

That’s so good of you. Nice that someone’s not really bothered

 

[AkanjisAfro]

That would be quite amusing, if true.

I imagine it isn't though...

Its legit

https://resources.premierleague.com/premierleague/document/2022/07/19/40085fed-1e9e-4c33-9f14-0bcf57857da2/PL_Handbook_2022-23_DIGITAL_18.07.pdf

 

[Leyland Blue]

Does this mean we won’t be signing a left back anytime soon?

 

[Aguero_Element]

City being charged with losing to spurs

 

[KS55]

If it goes to high court then any stolen evidence is inadmissible so this can't be about the hacked emails

In that case, you can see a quick rule change from the PL!