PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

All well and good that most of us are convinced we will win this case, but what does Omar know? Can't see the rags serving legals if they didn't get the nod from Omar that there was a chance they could win, hopefully it's a load of made up bullshit, but it does seem weird it's the rags considering a few of ours have jumped ship to them
Maybe Omar has been telling tales while rimming plastic Jim? Anything to appear relevant.

Who knows and tbh who cares. We have done nothing wrong, no amount of scare tactics or lies will change facts. The charges were dressed up to have maximum impact and in a way they have succeeded. We only won a treble and 4 in a row -:)

Slow news week so let’s rehash same old shit and stick breaking at the start.

Bunch of shysters.
 
Last edited:
Yes - in fairness it is detailed in the article too. Other clubs can either ask the IC for compensation (or the IC can award unilaterally) or go to Rule X arbitration. I doubt only these teams have written to City on this and it is more than a reservation of rights (which wouldn't suffice in all likelihood). Very likely a full standstill has been agreed by City or actual proceedings under Rule X commenced but potentially agreed to be stayed pending the outcome.
Why would the club agree to a full standstill? What would happen if they didn't?
 
All well and good that most of us are convinced we will win this case, but what does Omar know? Can't see the rags serving legals if they didn't get the nod from Omar that there was a chance they could win, hopefully it's a load of made up bullshit, but it does seem weird it's the rags considering a few of ours have jumped ship to them
As @slbsn has said, most PL clubs will probably have given similar notice. Doubt anything Berrada said would sway United from taking that course of action either way.
 
Why would the club agree to a full standstill? What would happen if they didn't?
Would, potentially, force the other party to commence Rule X proceedings which is costly, a distraction and a pain because it would run in parallel to the case. Hence I think City would have had to accept that other clubs would potentially have claims if there was a finding against them.
 
Would, potentially, force the other party to commence Rule X proceedings which is costly, a distraction and a pain because it would run in parallel to the case. Hence I think City would have had to accept that other clubs would potentially have claims if there was a finding against them.
That makes sense other than what could they possibly base their case on if there isn't any current proof of any compensation deserving rule breaking by the club?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.