PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[hcblue95]

Tevez was one of those rare players who ran and pressed all day but also had quality on the ball. A bit like Bernardo but with more end product. I loved him as a player.

 

[jaiguruKun]

That’s the point. 3rd party ownership is outlawed so you couldn’t have a player who was owned by a business & not a football club. No idea why but that’s the rules…….. that most clubs have to abide by.

The issue with the West Ham deal for Tevez was they only bought part of the player, the rest was owned by his agents - this arrangement did not comply with PL rules. The Rags effectively borrowed him for two years and owned him outright on loan for that limited period which was OK. When that arrangement came to an end, he was owned by Kia whatsiname's company again and we bought him outright from that same company.

 

[jaiguruKun]

Tevez was one of those rare players who ran and pressed all day but also had quality on the ball. A bit like Bernardo but with more end product. I loved him as a player.

Imagine how good Tevez in his prime would have been under Pep?! Such a shame their paths never crossed. Anyway, we digress.

 

[bennyboy]

We should get him on every parade bus.

 

[cheekybids]

The issue with the West Ham deal for Tevez was they only bought part of the player, the rest was owned by his agents - this arrangement did not comply with PL rules. The Rags effectively borrowed him for two years and owned him outright on loan for that limited period which was OK. When that arrangement came to an end, he was owned by Kia whatsiname's company again and we bought him outright from that same company.

It can be dressed up any way it wants but in essence it was the same. Kia owned the rights to Tevez in both instances & whatever West Ham did they were told Tevez wasn’t there’s & the Rags paid his owners (Kia) £10m.

Its put to bed now but you think of the song & dance made of Mancini & you think of all the other stuff it’s a joke.

 

[cheekybids]

We should get him on every parade bus.

Should be next to a bouncy castle

 

[ancoats]

The issue with the West Ham deal for Tevez was they only bought part of the player, the rest was owned by his agents - this arrangement did not comply with PL rules. The Rags effectively borrowed him for two years and owned him outright on loan for that limited period which was OK. When that arrangement came to an end, he was owned by Kia whatsiname's company again and we bought him outright from that same company.

The 3rd party rule did not apply to United as they did not own him, West Ham still owned his registration But Kia Still owned his image rights this is how they loaned him to United, This is why City stepped in and took him from United, because the rule was changed and you had to buy the player fully and not 3rd party ownership.

City bought Tevez fully and Kia went back to just being his agent, I also think United played dirty with West Ham and they had no choice but to loan him to United or they would have had the Premier League kick them out,

Sheffield Utd took them to court for loss of earnings and won so West Ham was guilty but stayed up because man united make the rules that everybody else has to play against

 

[Prater70]

I hope the club remembers that while scruffy Jim was trying to hitch free lifts off City for a couple of his donkeys to an awards ceremony, they were hoping they could sue us out of existence, and if he ever has the nerve to ask for a ground share they get told to do one.

Agree. But who signed it off at Old Trafford. Glazers, Gill or Jim.?

 

[bigA]

Now we know who our real enemies are in regards to this case, we should now be digging up every little piece of dirt on those clubs in readiness for us to drop on their collective scumbag heads irrespective of the outcome of the IC. It's says a lot that clubs that are collectively around £5 billion in debt can tell the rest of the league what they can and cannot do. I think war is about to be declared on the red cartel and it's haemorrhoid hanger on, it's going to get really nasty.

 

[Roy paul brother]

Now we know who our real enemies are in regards to this case, we should now be digging up every little piece of dirt on those clubs in readiness for to drop on their collective scumbag heads irrespective of the outcome of the IC. It's says a lot that clubs that are collectively around £5 billion in debt can tell the rest of the league what they can and cannot do. I think war is about to be declared on the red cartel and it's haemorrhoid hanger on, it's going to get really nasty.

We were too lenient wit Liverpool when they hacked the computers,should have let Premier deal with it first then gone after damages from Liverpool themselves.I bet Mubarak would do it differently now.