‘Sky understand’
In other words Billy Bullshit.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
In other words Billy Bullshit.
First off I would be amazed if he could hack the UAE Executive Affairs.The Premier League will only have access to Manchester City's official emails and documents. For example, Simon Pearce used his Executive Affairs Authority (EAA) email address in communications related to the club's financial matters. There is no way the Premier League would be granted access to emails from the UAE Executive Affairs Authority. Rui Pinto, on the other hand, might have had access to such communications.
Pinto's lawyer believed they had presented enough evidence against City. He mentioned that they were shocked when they heard the CAS verdict. I also think that holding onto a hard drive or two serves as a good life insurance.
I have no idea, but it has been confirmed by the French anti-corruption agency that the data has been shared with Germany, Belgium, and other countries.
Second he wouldn’t use his UAE Executive Affairs email unless he was doing something wrong and expecting to be caught.
Pinto thought he had evidence yet it turned out to be nothing at CAS.
Info has been passed to authorities yet nothing has happened so it wasn’t anything.
Finally you’re saying he is holding stuff back as life insurance leaving aside the accusation that he would be got rid of by the sheik.
Carnt have it both ways he has passed everything on to authorities we screwed and he is holding something back
If he is holding it back as insurance then we don’t need to worry do we as he will keep hold of it.
I go back to my point he would have passed it on by now and we would know if it was anything.
To me your post reads either not very incoherent a rag or conspiracy theorist
Last edited:
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
Lock the **** up.First off I would be amazed if he could hack the UAE Executive Affairs.
Second he wouldn’t use his UAE Executive Affairs email unless he was doing something wrong and expecting to be caught.
Pinto thought he had evidence yet it turned out to be nothing at CAS.
Info has been passed to authorities yet nothing has happened so it wasn’t anything.
Finally you’re saying he is holding stuff back as life insurance leaving aside the accusation that he would be got rid of by the sheik.
Carnt have it both ways he has passed everything on to authorities we screwed and he is holding something back
If he is holding it back as insurance then we don’t need to worry do we as he will keep hold of it.
I go back to my point he would have passed it on by now and we would know if it was anything.
To me your post reads either not very coherent a rag or conspiracy theorist
Whistleblower my arse.
He is a two bit criminal and deserves a good kicking.
Lock the **** up.
Whistleblower my arse.
He is a two bit criminal and deserves a good kicking.
Forget buying a midfielder we should be hiring a sniper.
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
I’m sure Abu Dhabi intelligence could make it look like an erm accident!!Forget buying a midfielder we should be hiring a sniper.
Hitman 47- tho Phil can’t hit a barn door these days so maybe someone else?
Zin 'messiah' Zimmer
Well-Known Member
Been a while since I’ve mustered an arousal from the forumJust to complicate things further the standard of proof in criminal trials isn’t universally applied as being ‘sure’.
Certain defences, if raised by the defence, require the mental gymnastics of the jury/tribunal of fact applying the balance of probabilities to that particular defence in conjunction with being sure the offence has been made out more widely by the prosecution.
So two standards of proof for one offence.
Any statutory due diligence defence for a regulatory offence, once raised, requires the application of this standard of proof, with the burden of proof resting with the defence, in respect of that defence, once raised by them. The burden of proof for the jury being sure of guilt for the index offence rests with the prosecution.
Hopefully that further clears things up…
Zin 'messiah' Zimmer
Well-Known Member
Lee Bradbury going cheapForget buying a midfielder we should be hiring a sniper.
Pinto’s lawyer expressing shock was just PR.The Premier League will only have access to Manchester City's official emails and documents. For example, Simon Pearce used his Executive Affairs Authority (EAA) email address in communications related to the club's financial matters. There is no way the Premier League would be granted access to emails from the UAE Executive Affairs Authority. Rui Pinto, on the other hand, might have had access to such communications.
Pinto's lawyer believed they had presented enough evidence against City. He mentioned that they were shocked when they heard the CAS verdict. I also think that holding onto a hard drive or two serves as a good life insurance.
I have no idea, but it has been confirmed by the French anti-corruption agency that the data has been shared with Germany, Belgium, and other countries.
Really?Second he wouldn’t use his UAE Executive Affairs email unless he was doing something wrong and expecting to be caught.
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,851
Pinto’s lawyer expressing shock was just PR.
Same script as Ceferin.