PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[KS55]

I agree with what your saying that it would involve a lot of people and a lot of conspiracy especially from sponsors however I don’t know if the auditors would have to be in on it or just be deceived

Once the PL issued their charges (or even earlier), you can be sure our auditors carried out a lengthy check of the relevant job bags. They will have traced the origins of monies and their route into City’s coffers. They will have reconstructed the audit trails. If not satisfied, they would have resigned.
You can be sure that we have not deceived our auditors.

 

[GaudinoMotors]

He has clearly come to this conclusion on the basis that he prefers UEFA's verdict! Do these people not realise how fukin transparent their agenda is?

View attachment 138988

What insight - who is this thick fuck?

 

[manimanc]

Jesus wept. This rag says the result is on the dark web

Their delusion is off the scale.
These are the pricks who was so cocky as they swept everything up that they sung they do what they want.
They can't match us on or off the pitch so bang goes them having any normal conversation or neutral ground to stand on so what is their go to phrase they've all adopted?
We've cheated the system. Lol. Isn't it so immature.

And I tell you why they have that outlook. It's a generational and social media thing. I played my son at table tennis ages ago. Me, I'm 50, overweight and have bad knees. My lad is young, energetic, and has that sporty streak in him. I had him dancing all around the table, and you know what his first words to me was?

I'm cheating. I'm fuckin cheating. I was literally stood still like a fat wobbling jelly but putting shots away like a pro and he couldn't hack it. So out comes the cheat phrase.
Pretty much like all the pricks on social media. They got their fingers in their ears and call us cheats. They don't know anything else.


(Well, that's my take on proceedings anyway)

 

[halfcenturyup]

Jesus wept. This rag says the result is on the dark web

Actually, that is pretty much how it will go, imo, if I understand what the gibbering idiot is trying to say .....

 

[ayrshire_blue]

Actually, that is pretty much how it will go, imo, if I understand what the gibbering idiot is trying to say .....

Can you translate "non conclusive due to the source"? Not entirely sure why I'm wasting my time trying to work out what he's havering about, but since you've posted that's pretty much how you see it...what does it actually mean?

 

[feedmpenzaandhewillscore]

Actually, that is pretty much how it will go, imo, if I understand what the gibbering idiot is trying to say .....

What was he searching for on the dark web to end up finding that? 115 charges doesnt exactly have key word searches for buying a gun, drugs or having someone killed.

 

[slbsn]

That surely has to be a ridiculous notion that everybody lied under oath at the cas hearing?

Very unlikely surely

 

[Invisible Man's Bandage]

Very unlikely surely

Slightly off topic but do you think Nick Harris could be in potential trouble for selling illegally obtained material (ref your tweet to him yesterday)?

 

[halfcenturyup]

Can you translate "non conclusive due to the source"? Not entirely sure why I'm wasting my time trying to work out what he's havering about, but since you've posted that's pretty much how you see it...what does it actually mean?

He clearly means that Nick Harris / Magic Twat appearing as a witness for the PL was a bridge too far for the panel :)

Anyway, if the panel decides the evidence isn't conclusive,.or is insufficient which is more likely, I won't care how they justify it. Also if the judgment is already on the web and we all think it will take three months to write it, then it must have finished the day after it started. I can get behind that.

 

[JewelZee]

How do you know? Absolutely nobody has any idea how it'll be dealt with in the event of a bad outcome. Much the same as nobody can say for certain how the verdict is going to go - people have stronger opinions than others either way but at the end of the day, we will just have to wait.

I don't think POD posted anything controversial, just speculation of which there's about 75,000 posts.

How do I know what? That SM distancing himself from the case if he thought things were going bad isn't even an option? What are you smoking friend?

Also, PofD claimed that Tolmie's posts indicate that TH doesn't understand the PSR rules when in fact it's the complete opposite. Tolmie suggested we did not go the shareholder loan route because we may have been prescient enough to foresee these loans eventually having to be included in the calculations of a club's PSR. Personally, I think that's a bit of a stretch but it's 100% NOT an indication of Tolmie not knowing what he's talking about in terms of PSR. Quite the opposite.

PofD has some sort of Schleprock shtick going, I get it, but really he's just a cartoon version of the Grim Reaper...