When we are cleared, I guarantee several journos will hint that it was fixed for us by Starmer’s trip to AbuDhabi and Dubai. All the magic hat brigade will just openly say this.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
mexico1970
Well-Known Member
alice who the f..k is alice
She lives next door.
Patel is only pretty above the waist. Lower down, she is HUGE.It's me I'm the friend. She's up there with Priti Patel in the women I disgust myself by being attracted to stakes.
You can have him, I’ll have Spanish Dave : )I’m not ashamed to say but I love and miss that man
We’ve been incredibly lucky Blues.
samuel is one ,but i cant think of anyone else who has fought our corner,its been a relentless pile on .Yes our "client journalists" seem to have kept a low profile over the last 10 years when we have been vilified in one of the most hateful smear campaigns sport has ever seen. I can honestly only recall a handful of articles defending City over the allegations in the last decade and they were from Martin Samuel, one of the most respected sports jourrnalists in the UK.
Rory Bluelow
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 May 2014
- Messages
- 2,249
Sounds like you’ve some inside knowledge there mate. Are we talking huge arse or wizard’s sleeve ?Patel is only pretty above the waist. Lower down, she is HUGE.
She's like us so.Patel is only pretty above the waist. Lower down, she is HUGE
MASSIVE
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
As you say, wait and see.OK, so nobody else seems to be interested in this, so I checked again.
The handbook on the PL website is definitely the July version without the changes made in November to make the rules "lawful". So the new amended version, which was posted last week, has been removed.
Of course, this could just be a mistake by PL (likely I suppose): either posting the amended version in error last week, or removing the link to the amended version in error this week.
Or, it could mean the FA haven't approved the amended rules yet, which would already be unusual.
Or, and bear with me, the tribunal has agreed with City that the APT rules as a whole are unlawful and so the amended rules had to be taken down. The consequences of that would be total victory for City in the APT case and total chaos for the PL.
Let's wait and see what happens.
Perhaps the PL should have done that instead of taking a vote on a potentially still illegal modified version.
eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
For How Long? (Not the Chinese centre half at Dortmund)She lives next door.
lancs blue
Well-Known Member
Gooner gets City off the hook? I can live with that.When we are cleared, I guarantee several journos will hint that it was fixed for us by Starmer’s trip to AbuDhabi and Dubai. All the magic hat brigade will just openly say this.