PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

He did if I recall, OK people seem to think he was guessing but he DID get it right.
He did and I’m not sure that it was just a lucky punt as some are suggesting. I’ve said before - originally on the Sunday night before the CAS verdict was out - that the staff were told on the Friday before the official announcement that we’d been successful in our appeal. I just can’t remember if Cheeseman’s tweet was before the Friday or on the Friday itself. If it was the latter then I reckon he was tipped off by one of the staff at the club.

Just 24 hours later on the Saturday night, the founding member of one of the OSC branches was pissed up down the pub and telling everyone who cared to listen that we’d won!
 
We’ve been through all this the other week but you obviously missed it.

While talk of a 40 point deduction is almost certainly a Chinese whisper, Cheeseman relaying the story wasn’t a Chinese whisper. He said it and he knows he said it. He told one of ours at Anfield the other week and said that his source was someone “high up” at the club. The person he told was hardly going to keep it to himself was he? No, of course he wasn’t. Especially as that person, like Cheeseman, has plenty of contacts in the media and also a couple at the club. So the first thing he did was check Cheeseman’s story out with Tolmie who he’s been mates with for 30 years and to try and find out if Tolmie had heard anything along similar lines. Tolmie reverted back to him saying Cheesy was chatting shit. Since then, Cheesy has subsequently denied ever saying it. I find that disappointing to be honest. Unlike some on here, I’ve always had a lot of time for him.

Now it’s up to you if you want to believe the above but Tolmie can back some of it up, and although he himself didn’t hear it from Cheeseman, the person who did is a long-standing mate of his and isn’t going to make shit like that up. For some reason, I got pelters on here from some quarters when all I’ve ever done on here is post any info in good faith. I’ve posted positive and negative snippets on here about this case. I bet if Cheeseman had told my mate something wholly positive instead, those same detractors on here would’ve no doubt been wanking themselves silly about it. In fact, it can be argued that what I posted wasn’t entirely negative anyway because I made sure I also posted Tolmie’s rebuttal.
as you were replying to me, i'll drop it here too. not that my one single post was going on about it.
i merely said that every one who has posted it is equally as guilty of spreading rumours as cheeseman if not more so. thats how rumours work. in my opinion of course. cheeseman seems to be getting unjustly viewed. i wasn't having a dig at anyone at all.
 
We’ve been through all this the other week but you obviously missed it.

While talk of a 40 point deduction is almost certainly a Chinese whisper, Cheeseman relaying the story wasn’t a Chinese whisper. He said it and he knows he said it. He told one of ours at Anfield the other week and said that his source was someone “high up” at the club. The person he told was hardly going to keep it to himself was he? No, of course he wasn’t. Especially as that person, like Cheeseman, has plenty of contacts in the media and also a couple at the club. So the first thing he did was check Cheeseman’s story out with Tolmie who he’s been mates with for 30 years and to try and find out if Tolmie had heard anything along similar lines. Tolmie reverted back to him saying Cheesy was chatting shit. Since then, Cheesy has subsequently denied ever saying it. I find that disappointing to be honest. Unlike some on here, I’ve always had a lot of time for him.

Now it’s up to you if you want to believe the above but Tolmie can back some of it up, and although he himself didn’t hear it from Cheeseman, the person who did is a long-standing mate of his and isn’t going to make shit like that up. For some reason, I got pelters on here from some quarters when all I’ve ever done on here is post any info in good faith. I’ve posted positive and negative snippets on here about this case. I bet if Cheeseman had told my mate something wholly positive instead, those same detractors on here would’ve no doubt been wanking themselves silly about it. In fact, it can be argued that what I posted wasn’t entirely negative anyway because I made sure I also posted Tolmie’s rebuttal.
Fair but you didn't help yourself with the "I'm not going to name my source but DM me" stuff then told everyone the source anyway. It looked from the outside thatvyou were enjoying it. Along with the obvious idea that knowing the judgement of a case before the thing has even finished is a strange thing to say.
I agree that people who pass on a whisper get too much shit but in this one specific incident, it came across on you poorly.
 
We’ve been through all this the other week but you obviously missed it.

While talk of a 40 point deduction is almost certainly a Chinese whisper, Cheeseman relaying the story wasn’t a Chinese whisper. He said it and he knows he said it. He told one of ours at Anfield the other week and said that his source was someone “high up” at the club. The person he told was hardly going to keep it to himself was he? No, of course he wasn’t. Especially as that person, like Cheeseman, has plenty of contacts in the media and also a couple at the club. So the first thing he did was check Cheeseman’s story out with Tolmie who he’s been mates with for 30 years and to try and find out if Tolmie had heard anything along similar lines. Tolmie reverted back to him saying Cheesy was chatting shit. Since then, Cheesy has subsequently denied ever saying it. I find that disappointing to be honest. Unlike some on here, I’ve always had a lot of time for him.

Now it’s up to you if you want to believe the above but Tolmie can back some of it up, and although he himself didn’t hear it from Cheeseman, the person who did is a long-standing mate of his and isn’t going to make shit like that up. For some reason, I got pelters on here from some quarters when all I’ve ever done on here is post any info in good faith. I’ve posted positive and negative snippets on here about this case. I bet if Cheeseman had told my mate something wholly positive instead, those same detractors on here would’ve no doubt been wanking themselves silly about it. In fact, it can be argued that what I posted wasn’t entirely negative anyway because I made sure I also posted Tolmie’s rebuttal.
You did fuck all wrong mate. Regulars know you aren't a bullshitter. You're getting shit because people don't like the message.

I'm hoping it's chinese whispers ("If it doesn't go our way the worst we could get might be 40 points" kind of quote) but I don't doubt you're reporting in good faith.
 
With all the rumours flying about someone, somewhere will be proven right. However from what I have read about the evidence, if the PL give us anything greater than a slap on the wrist fine for non co-operation then they will be creating a very, very large precedent where everyone will be questioning, probably quite rightly, why every single financial misstep of any club is not punished with points deductions. It will turn the Premier League into a joke.
 
as you were replying to me, i'll drop it here too. not that my one single post was going on about it.
i merely said that every one who has posted it is equally as guilty of spreading rumours as cheeseman if not more so. thats how rumours work. in my opinion of course. cheeseman seems to be getting unjustly viewed. i wasn't having a dig at anyone at all.
No probs mate
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.