I don't think it is directly relevant for a few reasons but worth noting that the CAS hearing was 3 days largely by remote regarding six emails and the decision still took 4 months!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
What sort of length are you expecting in terms of the judgment?I don't think it is directly relevant for a few reasons but worth noting that the CAS hearing was 3 days largely by remote regarding six emails and the decision still took 4 months!
CAS was 93 pages, feel like this one could be War and Peace.
Reason I ask is mainly to do with initial media response. As you know from APT and CAS, the media run with headlines without understanding or reading the document. So we actually have to wait a day or three for qualified people to read, digest, and contextualise it. CAS was closer to a couple of weeks. By that point, the media battle is lost and the myths have started.
Hundreds of pages 300-500?What sort of length are you expecting in terms of the judgment?
CAS was 93 pages, feel like this one could be War and Peace.
Reason I ask is mainly to do with initial media response. As you know from APT and CAS, the media run with headlines without understanding or reading the document. So we actually have to wait a day or three for qualified people to read, digest, and contextualise it. CAS was closer to a couple of weeks. By that point, the media battle is lost and the myths have started.
So realistically it's going to take a month for sensible people to be able to explain it all properly?Hundreds of pages 300-500?
You could have saved yourself a lot of grief by tossing them overboard as soon as you realised they were rags.Was minding my own business on a Musical Christmas Cruise on the Rhine in Cologne this afternoon when suddenly two rags appeared in front of me discussing last night's defeat at Tottenham
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Sensible people? Pfft, it'll take just 5 seconds for twatter to break it down.So realistically it's going to take a month for sensible people to be able to explain it all properly?
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Obviously I need to try harder ;)Not sure if you are trying to be insulting? but i will try again.
An independent UEFA panel found us guilty of everything, so we went to CAS, but before we went to CAS we informed them, we would not accept any charge without proof, even going to the point of going to the other arbitration panel, which would have ruined CAS, since their job is not to find guilt, but a path that both can accept, so they dismissed all the charges where there was no proof, and upheld non cooperation, even though it was not proven that UEFA had a right to access these papers.
Since then there have been other PL panels, most noticeably Leicester City, that have also found guilt without relying on the rules, indeed the independent regulator that illegally withheld City funding can be called a PL panel.
So we get to the 115,the first thing City did was object to the Arsenal fan judge, they did this to get the same assurances we got of CAS, since his name is going to be on any appeal
What is this "other arbitration panel, [who] would have ruined CAS" nonsense?
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Depends on the font size.What sort of length are you expecting in terms of the judgment?
I'll wait for the audio bookDepends on the font size.
For Fonts SakeDepends on the font size.