PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Behave. Talkshite slag us off when we were winning.
Yes they do i agree but they have always trawled here and any chink in the armour they pose it as a question for rags and dippers to ring in and to bait blues into ringing . I stopped listening to them years ago but they get posted on here so i know they are still doing it . They must be licking their lips at all the panic amongst blues at the moment
 
Yes they do i agree but they have always trawled here and any chink in the armour they pose it as a question for rags and dippers to ring in and to bait blues into ringing . I stopped listening to them years ago but they get posted on here so i know they are still doing it . They must be licking their lips at all the panic amongst blues at the moment
Would not be surprised if some of their "researchers" have accounts on here.
 
If it wasn’t winter outside , I would be a erected unicorn with my plumed plum instead of two pairs of resins . What gives ?
 
Players can't even keep a line up secret...

No player knows the outcome of the hearing. Nobody does. Even if someone knew, they would only know the verdict on liability and not on sanction because they haven't even had that bit of the hearing.

Every soft signal is positive - another clean audit published 4 months before the deadline with no red flags, huge non-essential infrastructure investment, repeated executive confidence, Silver Lake further investment, no board resignations etc.

The team have collapsed on the pitch for football reasons.
But all these youtubers said we're getting relegated/points deduction/put out of business/millions of pounds in fines/banished to playing at Hough End on a Sunday morning.

And these kids have their ears to the ground and their fingers on the pulse....
 
Players can't even keep a line up secret...

No player knows the outcome of the hearing. Nobody does. Even if someone knew, they would only know the verdict on liability and not on sanction because they haven't even had that bit of the hearing.

Every soft signal is positive - another clean audit published 4 months before the deadline with no red flags, huge non-essential infrastructure investment, repeated executive confidence, Silver Lake further investment, no board resignations etc.

The team have collapsed on the pitch for football reasons.
Thank you. I think a great many of us needed that post…….
 
Pinto is already a convicted criminal. The prosecution case was proven in his first trial. The court rejected his claims to be a whistleblower and the evidence was overwhelming. He demanded money from Doyen Sports agency not to relase information he had hacked. The next trial involves more extortion charges. None of these cases relate to City. He has not a cat in hell's chance of convincing any court he is a whistleblower. He had money in Swiss bank accounts he had taken from other organisations. There is no evidence he has more material from City other than that already publshed by Der Spiegl.
….…so an organisation that we have seen proven to be acting in an ‘unlawful, unfair and unreasonable’ manner is going to war with City armed with evidence obtained unlawfully by a man convicted of extortion, and whose previous evidence turned out to be bollocks?
Well, I’m convinced!!
 
….…so an organisation that we have seen proven to be acting in an ‘unlawful, unfair and unreasonable’ manner is going to war with City armed with evidence obtained unlawfully by a man convicted of extortion, and whose previous evidence turned out to be bollocks?
Well, I’m convinced!!
You couldn't make it up. Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction. That said I would be amazed if the PL have built their entire case on Pinto's stolen and misleading data.
 
Players can't even keep a line up secret...

No player knows the outcome of the hearing. Nobody does. Even if someone knew, they would only know the verdict on liability and not on sanction because they haven't even had that bit of the hearing.

Every soft signal is positive - another clean audit published 4 months before the deadline with no red flags, huge non-essential infrastructure investment, repeated executive confidence, Silver Lake further investment, no board resignations etc.

The team have collapsed on the pitch for football reasons.
 
But all these youtubers said we're getting relegated/points deduction/put out of business/millions of pounds in fines/banished to playing at Hough End on a Sunday morning.

And these kids have their ears to the ground and their fingers on the pulse....
More like their fingers on their cocks. Or up their jacksie.
 
I have read the text book again, just now and it says that establishing fraud is higher than for other types of civil action but not as high relating to criminal matters, but close to the criminal standard. :-)
Just to complicate things further the standard of proof in criminal trials isn’t universally applied as being ‘sure’.

Certain defences, if raised by the defence, require the mental gymnastics of the jury/tribunal of fact applying the balance of probabilities to that particular defence in conjunction with being sure the offence has been made out more widely by the prosecution.

So two standards of proof for one offence.

Any statutory due diligence defence for a regulatory offence, once raised, requires the application of this standard of proof, with the burden of proof resting with the defence, in respect of that defence, once raised by them. The burden of proof for the jury being sure of guilt for the index offence rests with the prosecution.

Hopefully that further clears things up…
 
Pinto is already a convicted criminal. The prosecution case was proven in his first trial. The court rejected his claims to be a whistleblower and the evidence was overwhelming. He demanded money from Doyen Sports agency not to relase information he had hacked. The next trial involves more extortion charges. None of these cases relate to City. He has not a cat in hell's chance of convincing any court he is a whistleblower. He had money in Swiss bank accounts he had taken from other organisations. There is no evidence he has more material from City other than that already publshed by Der Spiegl.
And a criminal in the witness protection program. Would a whistleblower be given that level of protection? Somehow I don't think so.

Pinto claims that he has received death threats as a result of his actions. If that is the case he must have pissed off some heavy and high powered people along the line somewhere. Yet he won't disclose who the threat was from.

Hopefully someone will catch up with this rat and give him his deserved comeuppance. Don't be surprised if he has an "accident" sometimes in the future.
 
And a criminal in the witness protection program. Would a whistleblower be given that level of protection? Somehow I don't think so.

Pinto claims that he has received death threats as a result of his actions. If that is the case he must have pissed off some heavy and high powered people along the line somewhere. Yet he won't disclose who the threat was from.

Hopefully someone will catch up with this rat and give him his deserved comeuppance. Don't be surprised if he has an "accident" sometimes in the future.
This guy is a POS, low life, scum of the Earth douche bag...
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top