PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

So what do you mean is nonsense?

1. We don’t know what we are accused of or if there is new evidence regarding the 54 charges of Misrepresentation of Financial Information.
2. The major threat to City lies in whether the Premier League has new evidence that they have either uncovered themselves or obtained from FootyLeaks/Pinto/EIC.
3. Pinto claims that there is more material and that data has been shared with authorities.

Haha, FFS - hardly academic sources or financial experts are they? Pinto is a convicted fraudster that has already been shown to manufacture 'evidence'. I imagine city's submitted accounts will be used instead of that load of tabloid fodder you are leaning on.

 

[TinFoilHat]

We need a new PL crusade to persecute us with and we'll do the treble again.

;)

 

[Keith Moon]

All your comments have been addressed by what we regard as knowledgeable blue moon posters.
We’ve read your thoughts so can you now just go home

Like who?

 

[KS55]

What concerns me about this case is that we don’t know what we are accused of or if there is new evidence regarding the 54 charges of Misrepresentation of Financial Information. The major threat to City lies in whether the Premier League has new evidence that they have either uncovered themselves or obtained from FootyLeaks/Pinto/EIC. If the latter, which is the source of this entire situation, claims that there is more material and that data has been shared with authorities, it is worrying.

Even in the unlikely event that there is new information, it still has to be shown that we have broken the regs in a serious way. Pinto’s first effort did not achieve that and it is highly unlikely that his second effort is more cogent. (Why would he have kept the best till last?)
I have no qualms about Pinto; only a new source could derail us and, as Stefan has pointed out, the soft signals suggest that the club is still confident. (I wonder what the soft signal Stefan is keeping to himself is all about.)

 

[CC1]

Like who?

if you can’t be bothered to read the thread I can’t be bothered engaging in further exchanges with you - bye. You’re on ignore - yayyyyyy

 

[WRicko]

So what do you mean is nonsense?

1. We don’t know what we are accused of or if there is new evidence regarding the 54 charges of Misrepresentation of Financial Information.
2. The major threat to City lies in whether the Premier League has new evidence that they have either uncovered themselves or obtained from FootyLeaks/Pinto/EIC.
3. Pinto claims that there is more material and that data has been shared with authorities.

Point 1 I am not sure your first point is correct but regardless City will know what’s going on and will have had to disclose everything both at CAS and to the Panel. We were cleared at CAS so I don’t see the issue.

Point 2 They won’t have anything new that’s not been disclosed. We had full disclosure at CAS and will have had to do the same at the panel regardless of what Pinto footy leaks etc might have had. Same as above

Pinto is no big deal your comments about him keep making no sense one minute he is a big threat. The next is he won’t hand everything over for fear of being taken out.

To the final point there won’t be more info especially with the authorities if there was we would know by now.

There would be raids on City the PL investigation would be on pause etc.

You seem like a genuine blue but your comments make no sense.

Worse than that you seem to expect us or even want us to fail on top of that you seem to think the owners have done something wrong and also that they are a threat to pinto life.

If you think all this are you still supporting the club ?

I think we are all bored of your posts now

 

[Stoned Rose]

So what do you mean is nonsense?

1. We don’t know what we are accused of or if there is new evidence regarding the 54 charges of Misrepresentation of Financial Information.
2. The major threat to City lies in whether the Premier League has new evidence that they have either uncovered themselves or obtained from FootyLeaks/Pinto/EIC.
3. Pinto claims that there is more material and that data has been shared with authorities.

Howling at the moon more like.

 

[Stoned Rose]

Question. - what’s the Fordham stuff?

Read the sticky.

 

[Lord Blue]

if you can’t be bothered to read the thread I can’t be bothered engaging in further exchanges with you - bye. You’re on ignore - yayyyyyy

I’ve used that button twice today. It’s brilliant. Wish I could prevent them seeing my posts too.

 

[Mancini’s Pastilles]

I'll still take winning this case over winning anything else this season but fucking Christ the decision better come quick so I can give less of a fuck about results like today

Decision aint coming anytime soon and then when it does come an appeal will be lodged which will bring it to around mid 2026