My point is that nobody in this thread knows whether it is true or not that the five hard drives he provided to the French and German authorities included additional information on City that, as Pinto claims, demonstrates criminal relevance. We can only guess.The point is that a) if there was, the PL would have probably got it in disclosure b) if they had it for the hearing via any source, City were well aware of the said material because parties have to disclose documents up on which they rely on. So what’s your point?
Any criminal relevance would have been passed to dibble ?My point is that nobody in this thread knows whether it is true or not that the five hard drives he provided to the French and German authorities included additional information on City that, as Pinto claims, demonstrates criminal relevance. We can only guess.
Wanted: English football journalist. Must be ignorant, lazy, unable to check facts, poor at spelling and support Mancister Untied.Thats not necessarily a barrier to being a football journalist. ;-)
AH, on Blue Moon back in the days before CAS, I told Stefan that HH was not Mansour...You're the one who said that you had written previously on the subject.
Actually I've got a bit of an inside track on this through my work, and there is no additional evidence from those hard drives regarding city.My point is that nobody in this thread knows whether it is true or not that the five hard drives he provided to the French and German authorities included additional information on City that, as Pinto claims, demonstrates criminal relevance. We can only guess.
now who's making it up? ;-)Actually I've got a bit of an inside track on this through my work, and there is no additional evidence from those hard drives regarding city.
You found this out in a Swiss Cheese factory?Actually I've got a bit of an inside track on this through my work, and there is no additional evidence from those hard drives regarding city
yeah, his story is full of holes.You found this out in a Swiss Cheese factory?