PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

slbsn said:
The point is that a) if there was, the PL would have probably got it in disclosure b) if they had it for the hearing via any source, City were well aware of the said material because parties have to disclose documents up on which they rely on. So what’s your point?
Click to expand...
My point is that nobody in this thread knows whether it is true or not that the five hard drives he provided to the French and German authorities included additional information on City that, as Pinto claims, demonstrates criminal relevance. We can only guess.
 
Keith Moon said:
My point is that nobody in this thread knows whether it is true or not that the five hard drives he provided to the French and German authorities included additional information on City that, as Pinto claims, demonstrates criminal relevance. We can only guess.
Click to expand...
Any criminal relevance would have been passed to dibble ?
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Thats not necessarily a barrier to being a football journalist. ;-)
Click to expand...
Wanted: English football journalist. Must be ignorant, lazy, unable to check facts, poor at spelling and support Mancister Untied.
Apply at MUFC Supporters HQ, Salford Keys by answering the following question: What punishment should MCFC receive for cheating whether they are found guilty or not?
 
Keith Moon said:
My point is that nobody in this thread knows whether it is true or not that the five hard drives he provided to the French and German authorities included additional information on City that, as Pinto claims, demonstrates criminal relevance. We can only guess.
Click to expand...
Actually I've got a bit of an inside track on this through my work, and there is no additional evidence from those hard drives regarding city.
 
Keith Moon said:
My point is that nobody in this thread knows whether it is true or not that the five hard drives he provided to the French and German authorities included additional information on City that, as Pinto claims, demonstrates criminal relevance. We can only guess.
Click to expand...
No, we can draw logical conclusions, which seems beyond you. Half a dozen Blues, who clearly know more about the case than you, have answered all your points. You should desist now and go home for a lie down.
 
johnny crossan said:
Yes, it's odd that someone of his vintage should offer a series of damaging possible scenarios for the club without any supporting evidence. A hacked account perhaps?
Click to expand...
I’ve no problem with him (or anyone else) offering a ‘series of damaging possible scenarios’.
It’s the fact that he’s going over the same shit over and over again.
All completely baseless and driven by ‘what if’s’.
Which is why I said earlier I think he’s wumming.
 
slbsn said:
1. We do know with near certainty - neither party has guided the media away from explanations in the media. It’s the CAS allegations re run plus Fordham, Mancini etc and a dollop of non coop.
2. The threat to City is if they have actually carried out the alleged wholesale fraud and concealment. Btw evidence isn’t “uncovered” - they just got given it in disclosure
3. Nobody needs the Pinto docs any more. The damage was done years ago. Now the authorities have due cause to ask questions directly and require disclosure

Last reply
Click to expand...
How many times have you had to state that following disclosure Pinto is no longer relevant. I admire your patience
 
spider blue said:
What ever mate you’re certainly ruffling a few feathers on here.
Click to expand...
The funny thing is, I don’t really have a different take on how I think this will end—basically, that even if we’re guilty, they won’t be able to prove it. And if we’re innocent, there’s nothing to worry about. We might get some stick for Mancini and Fordham, but it shouldn’t be a huge disaster.

I’ve written about the obvious threats that could lead to us being found guilty, which, of course, are that the Premier League has found new evidence, either from the stuff they asked for from City or from more material that came from Football Leaks or elsewhere. These are basic things that no sensible person should get upset about.

You need to be able to talk about what might go wrong without people throwing their toys out of the pram.
 
Keith Moon said:
I have never said that Pinto was relevant following disclosure. The additional 14TB of hacked data has been available years before the disclosure.
Click to expand...
But you have continued to reference him, even though it has been pointed out to you on multiple occasions that following disclosure he has no relevance. You've been like a fucking broken record.

Merry Christmas
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top