ScottSinclair
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Jun 2015
- Messages
- 6,176
Yes, let us all share the same opinions and feelings about everything to do with City and become a nice warm cult now, and if someone step out of line ban them
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Sheikh rattle and roll
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 May 2014
- Messages
- 2,187
Given the chance I think I could’ve loved her more than City
jaiguruKun
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 5,864
Unlikely as it was City that was hacked so they must have been documents within City’s control. But let’s say Pinto did and gave them to the PL (he didn’t but let’s say he did). Anything there being used in the case would be known to City many months ago. So?
It we've been engaged in fraud on a massive scale as alleged there would be a trail of docs from many other companies showing this to be the case which we, as the massively fraudulent enterprise we are alleged to be, have concealed. All these other companies would have to have been complicit in the alleged fraud and their hacked emails would show this. It seems very unlilkely indeed, but can we 100% discount this possibility?
Franny 1234
Well-Known Member
Am racking my brain regarding our home tie against Norwich in the FA Cup I was there in person in 1981. What have I forgotten. CTIDWho’s your favourite ever City player?
Best goal they ever scored?
Where did you sit / stand at Maine Rd?
How did you get to Maine Rd?
Where did you booze near Maine Rd?
Where do you sit now?
How do you get to Etihad now?
Where do you booze now?
What was unusual about the end of our 1981 cup tie home win v Norwich (and nothing to do with 6 different scorers btw)?!
Tell us a few anecdotes about your time following City, including names of people you went to matches with.
Tell us about some things you saw at matches that can’t be Googled but that we know happened.
If you can’t do any of the above- mods, fuck this **** right off.,
Lavinda Past
Well-Known Member
Am racking my brain regarding our home tie against Norwich in the FA Cup I was there in person in 1981. What have I forgotten. CTID
Same here!
44 bloody years ago...? I can't even remember what I had for my tea tonight!
Pinto hasn’t hacked all these companies - he hacked City. And who is talking about 100% anything. Nothing is 100%.It we've been engaged in fraud on a massive scale as alleged there would be a trail of docs from many other companies showing this to be the case which we, as the massively fraudulent enterprise we are alleged to be, have concealed. All these other companies would have to have been complicit in the alleged fraud and their hacked emails would show this. It seems very unlilkely indeed, but can we 100% discount this possibility?
But none of it matters now. The hearing has happened, the sides have put their case and all documents were shared between the parties months before that hearing.
Keith Moon
Well-Known Member
If the Premier League, prior to disclosure, obtained another Pinto-hacked document that proves we inflated our sponsorship, would this be considered irrelevant as evidence?Right. Well either the PL did have access (and so did City) or PL didn’t get these special hacked documents in time for their hearing but some or all of those documents may have appeared in the hearing bundle through disclosure exchanges. Either way, Pinto docs are now irrelevant because as you accept there are no secret Pinto docs that only the PL have
If the Premier League, prior to disclosure, obtained another Pinto-hacked document that proves we inflated our sponsorship, would this be considered irrelevant as evidence?
Please, for the love of god, stop.
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
If the Premier League, prior to disclosure, obtained another Pinto-hacked document that proves we inflated our sponsorship, would this be considered irrelevant as evidence?
Ffs can you PM him instead of plastering this utter shit all over the thread. You’re doing everyone’s nut in.
No document would prove it in itself but a document suggesting it would be clearly relevant and obviously required to be swapped during disclosure between the parties many months ago. Again, now irrelevant as subsumed into the documents in play in the case.If the Premier League, prior to disclosure, obtained another Pinto-hacked document that proves we inflated our sponsorship, would this be considered irrelevant as evidence?