PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

CPPSC said:
John Bond took a direct route to see Kevin!

Got to be better than the Moonies thread
Click to expand...
On the assumption that the Moon fella is actually a blue - and not a deliberately selfish fucker - I hope he has a good look in the mirror and realises what he has put fellow blues through.

Coming on and seeing that the thread had jumped so many pages - I began going through what turned out to be utter dross during the night. Sorry - proper dickhead for me

Edit: Oh FFS - he's still at it - that will be me back out of the thread for a few hours
 
slbsn said:
No document would prove it in itself but a document suggesting it would be clearly relevant and obviously required to be swapped during disclosure between the parties many months ago. Again, now irrelevant as subsumed into the documents in play in the case.
Click to expand...
Wouldn’t there have been full disclosure for CAS so nothing to worry about and full disclosure for this regardless of what Pinto may or may not have or would the Panel need pinto or someone to point them in the right direction ask for the right docs a bit like freedom of information you cannot just ask for everything
 
KS55 said:
Wanted: English football journalist. Must be ignorant, lazy, unable to check facts, poor at spelling and support Mancister Untied.
Apply at MUFC Supporters HQ, Salford Keys by answering the following question: What punishment should MCFC receive for cheating whether they are found guilty or not?
Click to expand...

You’ve just described Simon Stone.
 
Franny 1234 said:
Am racking my brain regarding our home tie against Norwich in the FA Cup I was there in person in 1981. What have I forgotten. CTID
Click to expand...
Spoiler alert










I googled it. It relates to John Bond and his efforts to console his son at full time ( he was still a Norwich City player at the time). I wasn't at the game
 
halfcenturyup said:
Oh Lord, nothing can ever be discounted 100%, why would anyone ever do that? But what you do when you form an opinion on anything is look at the likely evidence either way, consider the counter-evidence, the likelihood of any other evidence existing that may support or disprove the initial hypothesis and then come to an educated conclusion.

I have done this, in my mind at least, and have come to the conclusion that it is possible, however unlikely, that the club, its executives, board and owner together with at least two public companies and a set of auditors, have been involved in fraudulent behaviour presumably now for 15 years. But it is very much more likely that they haven't for a multitude of reasons and even if they had it would be almost impossible to prove to the standard required for a multitude of other reasons.

Fwiw, this conclusion, which I am perfectly at ease with, would be the same even if Pinto had given the PL full and unrestricted access to all the club's emails he hacked. Which he won't have been in a position to do, imho, no matter what the convicted extortionist and blackmailer says.
Click to expand...
You can’t expect some posters on here (& we know who I mean) to consider all sides before forming their opinion. They are transfixed by Pinto & negativity
:-)
:-)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.