PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

domalino said:
Well there's fewer than 2,000 KCs to begin with.

25% of those would be senior enough for this?

How many of those have decades of experience in sport? How many have been deputy high court judges? And how many have spent the last 8 years specialising in arbitration and mediation?


This guy was voted into his position overseeing all disciplinary cases by the 20 PL clubs 3 years ago. That means 19 (including City) were voting for someone who supported another team.
Click to expand...
I am sure he isn't the only one with the necessary qualifications and they could find one without a season ticket at a "big six" club. Anyway, I take your point that my whinging won't make any difference so I will shut up about it.

:)
 
bu
Manchester_lalala said:
If it goes to a fair Independent court, I’m confident we’ll get off without anything major. I just don’t trust this Arsenal fan leading the case for the PL and he gets to choose his team.
Click to expand...
but if the arsenal fan knows the high court is an option is he really going to give an unfair verdict?? knowing that if the high court rule he has given an unfair verdict he is finished.
 
havefaith said:
Is it not time for seperate threads on contract law, geopolitical consequences etc so we can all get up to speed on the necesscary arguements to defend ourselves in the wider world :-) :-)
Click to expand...

arbitration-for-dummies and learn tax law in 20 minutes (2022 edition) should be part of the Sportswasher's defenders kit we all got sent by Sheikh Mansour along with the barrel of crude did you not get yours?
 
bitterblue78 said:
Anyone think the premier league may offer us a settlement
Click to expand...
We can't do now it's gone to far,got to smash the cartel to bits and and take no shit,otherwise it will just carry on,id rather us get relegated than accept any settlement from the bastards...
 
markc123 said:
I rekon if we get found guilty I think the super league will rear its head again and this time I'd probably back it, its amazing that they're charging us for financial breaches there just out to get us and the premier league are so corrupt
Click to expand...

The Super League isn't happening. This is simply a play to redress the balance in the Premier League towards those clubs who believe they are the reason for the large TV deals in the first instance.

Each of the English clubs who signed up for the Super League were eventually forced to come back with their tails between their legs and sign an agreement not to try again, with a £300m fine for any such attempt.

So now they want a Super League under the umbrella of the Premier League, where mid to lower teams will vote for the vested interests of keeping United, Arsenal, Chelsea, Spurs and the Murderers in the equation.

City are the fall guy for it. Whether to take us to the wall or render us uncompetitive on and off the pitch for a period of time that provides no threat and tarred forever.

We want an independent regulator.

Even clubs like West Ham and Bournemouth don't want that.

Turkeys will always vote for Christmas, even if means taking their chances the butcher won't put them on the chopping block for a while.
 
Last edited:
lancs blue said:
Now that formal accusations have been made I would expect no public communications from either side, probably on the advice of the respective lawyers.
Click to expand...
That seems sensible. However the red cartel do have their useful idiot foot soldiers in the media. Let's see what 2 hypothetical cunts ( let's call them david and rick) try leaking to the press this time!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.