Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
That's what it said iirc. An eponymous chain of high street bookies. But I also recall the article said the money was the process of a sale of the chain.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
Well there's ADUG/Newton Investments, which are Abu Dhabi-based.Exactly - but it’s the usual acceptance for certain clubs. Imagine if we had been doing that ….
Exeter Blue I am here
Well-Known Member
Puns like that Strauss me out!That would keep them Bizet
Man_City_Loyal
Well-Known Member
That's what it said iirc. An eponymous chain of high street bookies. But I also recall the article said the money was the process of a sale of the chain.
I know PP have been buying up a lot of smaller chains
ChicagoBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 18,813
You’re both Baching mad!Puns like that Strauss me out!
Pingu the Penguin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 7,942
That’s my take on it. Journos who have invested years into this need to start to save face now. If we are cleared it will be “it was all too complex to prove but something dodgy was going on” innuendo. City need to sue someone post judgement to put a marker downThe narrative of our enemies has changed from “City and their Arab owners are cheats who must be relegated” to “ Their finances are too complex to understand. They must have something to hide.” Smells like good news to me.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
He can’t Handel the truth.You’re both Baching mad!
Good. Let’s use the system :-)Well there's ADUG/Newton Investments, which are Abu Dhabi-based.
You know, I don’t give a toss what everyone might think if - & hopefully when - we’re cleared.That’s my take on it. Journos who have invested years into this need to start to save face now. If we are cleared it will be “it was all too complex to prove but something dodgy was going on” innuendo. City need to sue someone post judgement to put a marker down
I’m just going to enjoy their hurt & suffering in view of all they have put us fans & the Club through
Honestly, I don’t know why you do this to yourselves. United haven’t had shareholder money for more than a decade aside from Ratcliffe which would have been checked by English lawyers. All of the money has been loans from well established institutions. There is no story here.Exactly - but it’s the usual acceptance for certain clubs. Imagine if we had been doing that ….