PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Clearly, United controls the Premier League and the rules, Everton and others had allowances turned down
How United £75million in allowances was passed was a joke and was not questioned or reported in the media because it was bent and rules dodged

A complicit media allows for corruption.

Silence or minor to explain Rags & Dippers & over the top crimes of the century to explain any innuendo around City.
 
So United failed Uefa FFP and was fined, So will the Premier League Open up a case against United

Also, if I create a fake hacked email and state I have found United had broken the rules with the Carlos Tevez loan and 3rd party ownership and payments were made to the 3rd party, City had to buy out Carlos Tevez ownership from KIa because you are not allowed 3rd party ownership in the Premier League, West Ham was punished for that reason
so how did United get around that for 2 seasons,


Unless the media make a song & dance about it nothing will happen.

Now imagine if Silverlake sent questions like this to the board & it got in the papers….

 
So how did the Premier League let United have £40million in allowances for Covid 19
Did they really lose £40million in match revenue ?? that's over £2million a game, the maths just doesn't add up

Also, we all know about the fake attendance figures they put out compared to the official police figures
I think United's published attendances tallied with police figures during Covid - zero at every game.
 
Sent Keith to the moon there good and proper !

Not really, I get the point that he is a pain in the ass and is like a dog with a bone when he thinks he has a point, but I will almost guarantee that when the judgment comes out, it will show the panel will have been asked to review the related party nature of the AD sponsors.

You could apply most of the arguments I have seen against that to the other allegations as well, yet here we are.
 
So how did the Premier League let United have £40million in allowances for Covid 19
Did they really lose £40million in match revenue ?? that's over £2million a game, the maths just doesn't add up

Also, we all know about the fake attendance figures they put out compared to the official police figures
They sent them an audit schedule showing multiple categories where they claim they lost £40m
 
Not really, I get the point that he is a pain in the ass and is like a dog with a bone when he thinks he has a point, but I will almost guarantee that when the judgment comes out, it will show the panel will have been asked to review the related party nature of the AD sponsors.

You could apply most of the arguments I have seen against that to the other allegations as well, yet here we are.
You also believe this case will review the audited accounting treatment of Aabar, Etisalat and Etihad as related parties and attempt to FMV the value of those contracts 2009-2018 rerunning the publicly known work of UEFA before 2014 and contrary to the position established in CAS? Be specific.

If you are right BDO were bonkers allowing City to put out the 23/24 numbers early because there is no doubt BDO had access to the PLs opening and expert reports on these points before signing off the accounts.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.